Yu Jason L, Rosen Ilene
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2020 Feb 15;16(2):303-308. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8188. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
The modified Mallampati (MM) grade and Friedman tongue position (FTP) are commonly used scales that assess the oropharynx during evaluation for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Though used by many practitioners, there is controversy in the literature regarding their practical utility. The goal of this review will be to review the history of how the MM and FTP were developed, to discuss current evidence for their usefulness in the workup of OSA, and to provide future direction to better understand their utility in the workup of OSA.
We searched the literature (PubMed) for the terms "modified Mallampati" and "Friedman tongue position." Articles were selected based on our study objectives emphasizing articles discussing the utility of MM and FTP in managing OSA.
MM and FTP have the potential to be useful assessment tools in the evaluation of OSA. When performing this examination, it is important for physicians and other medical providers to understand the pitfalls of the MM and FTP including the potential difficulty in performing the exam and the lack of consistency between examiners in both the terminology and execution of this physical exam finding. Better methods to standardize the assessment are necessary to ensure consistent evaluation among individual examiners while at the same time keeping the method simple and convenient for wide use as a clinical screening tool.
改良马兰帕蒂(MM)分级和弗里德曼舌位(FTP)是在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)评估过程中常用的评估口咽的量表。尽管许多从业者都在使用,但文献中对于它们的实际效用存在争议。本综述的目的是回顾MM和FTP的发展历程,讨论目前关于它们在OSA检查中有用性的证据,并为更好地理解它们在OSA检查中的效用提供未来方向。
我们在文献数据库(PubMed)中搜索了“改良马兰帕蒂”和“弗里德曼舌位”等术语。根据我们的研究目的选择文章,重点是讨论MM和FTP在管理OSA中的效用的文章。
MM和FTP有可能成为评估OSA的有用工具。在进行这项检查时,医生和其他医疗人员了解MM和FTP的缺陷非常重要,包括检查可能存在的困难以及检查者在该体格检查结果的术语和执行方面缺乏一致性。需要更好的方法来规范评估,以确保个体检查者之间的评估一致,同时保持方法简单方便,以便广泛用作临床筛查工具。