Suppr超能文献

美托洛尔与卡维地洛在心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、糖尿病和肾衰竭患者中的比较。

Metoprolol Versus Carvedilol in Patients With Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Renal Failure.

机构信息

Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, København, Denmark.

Respiratory Research Unit Zealand, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Naestved Hospital, Næstved, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;125(7):1069-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.048. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

Abstract

This study compared the survival and the risk of heart failure (HF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypoglycemia, and renal failure (RF) hospitalizations in geriatric patients exposed to carvedilol or metoprolol. Data sources were Danish administrative registers. Patients aged ≥65 and having HF, COPD, and DM were followed for 1 year from the first β-blocker prescription redemption. Patients' characteristics were used to 1:1 propensity score match carvedilol and metoprolol users. A Cox regression model was used to compute the hazard ratio (HR) of study outcomes. For statistically significant associations, a conditional inference tree was used to assess predictors most associated with the outcome. In total, 1,424 patients were included. No statistically significant differences were observed for survival (HR 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 1.11, p = 0.240) between carvedilol/metoprolol users. The same applied to COPD (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.05, p = 0.177), DM (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.10, p = 0.485), hypoglycemia (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.67, p = 0.707), and RF (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.69, p = 0.142) hospitalizations. Carvedilol users had a 38% higher hazard then metoprolol users of HF hospitalization during the follow-up period (HR 1.38; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.60, p <0.001). Artificial intelligence identified carvedilol exposure as the most important predictor for HF hospitalization. In conclusion, we found an increased risk of HF hospitalization for carvedilol users with this triad of diseases but no statistically significant differences in survival or risk of COPD, DM, hypoglycemia, and RF hospitalizations.

摘要

这项研究比较了暴露于卡维地洛或美托洛尔的老年患者的生存和心力衰竭(HF)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、糖尿病(DM)、低血糖和肾衰竭(RF)住院风险。数据来源是丹麦行政登记处。HF、COPD 和 DM 患者从首次β受体阻滞剂处方赎回后,随访 1 年。使用患者特征对卡维地洛和美托洛尔使用者进行 1:1 倾向评分匹配。Cox 回归模型用于计算研究结果的风险比(HR)。对于具有统计学意义的关联,使用条件推理树评估与结果最相关的预测因素。共有 1424 名患者纳入研究。卡维地洛/美托洛尔使用者之间的生存率无统计学差异(HR 0.86;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.67 至 1.11,p=0.240)。COPD(HR 0.88;95% CI 0.75 至 1.05,p=0.177)、DM(HR 0.95;95% CI 0.82 至 1.10,p=0.485)、低血糖(HR 0.88;95% CI 0.47 至 1.67,p=0.707)和 RF(HR 1.25;95% CI 0.93 至 1.69,p=0.142)住院率也无统计学差异。在随访期间,卡维地洛使用者 HF 住院的风险比美托洛尔使用者高 38%(HR 1.38;95% CI 1.19 至 1.60,p<0.001)。人工智能确定卡维地洛暴露是 HF 住院的最重要预测因素。总之,我们发现患有这三种疾病的卡维地洛使用者 HF 住院风险增加,但生存率或 COPD、DM、低血糖和 RF 住院风险无统计学差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验