Department of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Department of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Apr;29(4):104599. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104599. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
Atrial Fibrillation is the leading cause of embolic stroke, yet less than half of high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation are on adequate stroke prevention with oral anticoagulants. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke recognize the emergency department as a location for physicians to identify atrial fibrillation and initiate anticoagulants. We sought to compare anticoagulant prescription rates in patients with atrial fibrillation in various provider settings to identify opportunities for improvement in cardioembolic stroke prevention.
A retrospective cohort study of 436 patients with atrial fibrillation presenting to the emergency department from 2014 to 2018 was performed. Baseline characteristics, stroke risk, and rates of anticoagulant prescription were compared across 3 groups: (1) patients discharged from the emergency department, (2) patients admitted under observation status, and (3) patients admitted to inpatient hospital service.
Among 436 patients (47% women, 51% Hispanic), we identified 105 in the emergency department cohort, 131 in the observation cohort and 200 in the inpatient cohort. The average CHADS-VASc score was 2.5 in the emergency department cohort, 2.6 in the observation cohort and 3.3 in the inpatient cohort. Anticoagulants were prescribed for high-risk patients (CHADS-VASc score ≥ 2) in 17.5% (7/40) of the emergency department cohort compared to 73% (38/52, P< .0001) of the observation cohort and 80% (82/103 P< .0001) of the inpatient cohort.
Patients with atrial fibrillation are more likely to be prescribed anticoagulants if admitted to inpatient or under observation status compared to the emergency department.
心房颤动是引起栓塞性中风的主要原因,但仍有不足一半的高危心房颤动患者接受了充分的口服抗凝剂预防中风。预防中风的指南认识到,急诊科是医生识别心房颤动并开始使用抗凝剂的场所。我们旨在比较不同医疗提供者环境中患有心房颤动患者的抗凝药物处方率,以确定在预防心源性栓塞性中风方面可以改进的机会。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2014 年至 2018 年期间因心房颤动到急诊科就诊的 436 例患者。比较了 3 组患者的基线特征、中风风险和抗凝药物处方率:(1)从急诊科出院的患者;(2)接受观察治疗的患者;(3)收入住院服务的患者。
在 436 例患者(47%为女性,51%为西班牙裔)中,我们确定了急诊科队列中的 105 例、观察队列中的 131 例和住院队列中的 200 例。急诊科队列的平均 CHADS-VASc 评分为 2.5,观察队列为 2.6,住院队列为 3.3。在高危患者(CHADS-VASc 评分≥2)中,有 17.5%(7/40)的急诊科患者处方了抗凝药物,而观察队列中这一比例为 73%(38/52,P<.0001),住院队列中为 80%(82/103,P<.0001)。
与在急诊科就诊相比,住院或接受观察治疗的心房颤动患者更有可能被处方抗凝药物。