Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health, Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health, Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Apr;74:61-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.01.065. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
Various adjunctive techniques for neurointerventional procedures require a large-bore sheath introducer, but there is concern that this could result in more puncture site hemorrhagic complications despite using a vascular closure device. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between use of large-bore sheath introducer and post-procedural complications. Between January 2016 and April 2018, 126 neurointerventional procedures were performed in our hospital using 8 or 9 Fr sheath introducer in size and the Angio-Seal STS PLUS (St. Jude Medical, Minnetonka, USA). Hemorrhagic complications were defined as obvious swelling or bleeding at the puncture site or as extravascular bleeding detected by ultrasonography or contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The procedures were divided into a group with post-puncture bleeding (group B, n = 21) and a group without bleeding (group N, n = 105). Risk factors were compared between the groups according to the incidence of post-puncture bleeding. In addition, we assessed the outcome and approach to hemostasis in the procedures with bleeding. In result, hemorrhagic complications occurred in 21 procedures (17%), and pseudoaneurysm was detected in 4 procedures (3.2%). In 20 of group B (16%), manual compression was performed for an average of 36.4 min. One patient (0.79%) required surgical angioplasty. Risk factors for bleeding were not significantly different between the two groups. None of the patients with bleeding showed a decrease on the modified Rankin Scale. In conclusion, use of a large-bore sheath introducer may increase the incidence of post-puncture bleeding, but the outcome of this complication is acceptable.
各种神经介入手术的辅助技术需要使用大口径鞘管导入器,但尽管使用血管闭合装置,仍担心这会导致更多的穿刺部位出血并发症。本研究旨在评估使用大口径鞘管导入器与术后并发症之间的关系。在 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 4 月期间,我院共进行了 126 例神经介入手术,鞘管导入器大小为 8 或 9Fr,并使用 Angio-Seal STS PLUS(圣犹达医疗用品有限公司,美国明尼苏达州)。出血并发症定义为穿刺部位明显肿胀或出血,或超声或增强 CT 检测到血管外出血。将这些操作分为穿刺后出血组(B 组,n=21)和无出血组(N 组,n=105)。根据穿刺后出血的发生率,比较两组之间的危险因素。此外,我们评估了有出血的操作的结果和止血方法。结果,21 例(17%)出现出血并发症,4 例(3.2%)发现假性动脉瘤。B 组 20 例(16%)患者行手动压迫,平均压迫 36.4 分钟。1 例(0.79%)患者需要手术血管成形术。两组之间的出血危险因素无显著差异。所有出血患者的改良 Rankin 量表评分均未见下降。总之,使用大口径鞘管导入器可能会增加穿刺后出血的发生率,但这种并发症的结果是可以接受的。