University at Buffalo School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, New York.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7461. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7461.
To evaluate change in the ability of third-year pharmacy students to identify drugs that increase fall risk after training in and experience using the Medication Falls Risk Assessment Tool (MFRAT). An assessment was administered to students prior to MFRAT use and after MFRAT use. The assessment consisted of 10 medication regimens for various chronic conditions (50 distinct drug choices with 30 correct answers and 20 distractors), and students were to identify fall risk increasing drugs (FRIDs). Using a flipped-classroom approach, students viewed an online presentation on FRIDs and then participated in instructor guided, in-class application of the MFRAT using student-collected data from an actual patient case. Students completed medication therapy management (MTM) documentation. The assessment data for students who had previously used the MFRAT (experienced) were analyzed separately from first time users (inexperienced). Three assessment scores were evaluated: number correct (maximum 30; higher score is better), number of distractors (maximum 20; lower score better), and a combined total score (maximum 50; higher score better). In inexperienced users (n=104), pre- and post-assessment means improved significantly for correct score (24.9 vs 29.5) and total score (39.4 vs 44.3). Among experienced users (n=10), pre- and post-assessment means improved significantly for correct responses (27.3 vs 29.7), distractors (7.0 vs 3.5), and total score (40.3 vs 46.2). The ability of both pharmacy students who had used the MFRAT previously and those who had not to correctly identify FRIDs increased on the post-assessment.
评估三年级药学专业学生在使用 Medication Falls Risk Assessment Tool(MFRAT)进行培训和实践后,识别增加跌倒风险药物的能力的变化。在使用 MFRAT 之前和之后,向学生进行评估。评估包括 10 种不同慢性疾病的药物方案(50 种不同药物选择,30 个正确答案和 20 个干扰项),学生要识别增加跌倒风险的药物(FRIDs)。采用翻转课堂的方法,学生观看关于 FRIDs 的在线演示,然后在教师的指导下,使用学生从实际患者病例中收集的数据,在课堂上应用 MFRAT。学生完成药物治疗管理(MTM)文档。对之前使用过 MFRAT(有经验)的学生进行评估数据的分析与首次使用者(无经验)分开。评估了三个分数:正确数(最高 30 分;分数越高越好)、干扰项数(最高 20 分;分数越低越好)和总分(最高 50 分;分数越高越好)。在无经验的使用者(n=104)中,前测和后测的正确分数(24.9 对 29.5)和总分(39.4 对 44.3)均显著提高。在有经验的使用者(n=10)中,前测和后测的正确反应(27.3 对 29.7)、干扰项(7.0 对 3.5)和总分(40.3 对 46.2)均显著提高。使用过 MFRAT 的药学专业学生和未使用过 MFRAT 的学生在识别 FRIDs 的能力上都有所提高。