Suppr超能文献

药学专业学生使用创新评估工具识别增加跌倒风险药物的能力。

Pharmacy Students' Ability to Identify Fall Risk-Increasing Drugs Using an Innovative Assessment Tool.

机构信息

University at Buffalo School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, New York.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7461. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7461.

Abstract

To evaluate change in the ability of third-year pharmacy students to identify drugs that increase fall risk after training in and experience using the Medication Falls Risk Assessment Tool (MFRAT). An assessment was administered to students prior to MFRAT use and after MFRAT use. The assessment consisted of 10 medication regimens for various chronic conditions (50 distinct drug choices with 30 correct answers and 20 distractors), and students were to identify fall risk increasing drugs (FRIDs). Using a flipped-classroom approach, students viewed an online presentation on FRIDs and then participated in instructor guided, in-class application of the MFRAT using student-collected data from an actual patient case. Students completed medication therapy management (MTM) documentation. The assessment data for students who had previously used the MFRAT (experienced) were analyzed separately from first time users (inexperienced). Three assessment scores were evaluated: number correct (maximum 30; higher score is better), number of distractors (maximum 20; lower score better), and a combined total score (maximum 50; higher score better). In inexperienced users (n=104), pre- and post-assessment means improved significantly for correct score (24.9 vs 29.5) and total score (39.4 vs 44.3). Among experienced users (n=10), pre- and post-assessment means improved significantly for correct responses (27.3 vs 29.7), distractors (7.0 vs 3.5), and total score (40.3 vs 46.2). The ability of both pharmacy students who had used the MFRAT previously and those who had not to correctly identify FRIDs increased on the post-assessment.

摘要

评估三年级药学专业学生在使用 Medication Falls Risk Assessment Tool(MFRAT)进行培训和实践后,识别增加跌倒风险药物的能力的变化。在使用 MFRAT 之前和之后,向学生进行评估。评估包括 10 种不同慢性疾病的药物方案(50 种不同药物选择,30 个正确答案和 20 个干扰项),学生要识别增加跌倒风险的药物(FRIDs)。采用翻转课堂的方法,学生观看关于 FRIDs 的在线演示,然后在教师的指导下,使用学生从实际患者病例中收集的数据,在课堂上应用 MFRAT。学生完成药物治疗管理(MTM)文档。对之前使用过 MFRAT(有经验)的学生进行评估数据的分析与首次使用者(无经验)分开。评估了三个分数:正确数(最高 30 分;分数越高越好)、干扰项数(最高 20 分;分数越低越好)和总分(最高 50 分;分数越高越好)。在无经验的使用者(n=104)中,前测和后测的正确分数(24.9 对 29.5)和总分(39.4 对 44.3)均显著提高。在有经验的使用者(n=10)中,前测和后测的正确反应(27.3 对 29.7)、干扰项(7.0 对 3.5)和总分(40.3 对 46.2)均显著提高。使用过 MFRAT 的药学专业学生和未使用过 MFRAT 的学生在识别 FRIDs 的能力上都有所提高。

相似文献

6
The impact of a required course on third year pharmacy students' perceived abilities and intentions in providing medication therapy management.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Jan;11(1):94-105. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
9
Home medication reviews in a patient care experience for undergraduate pharmacy students.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Oct 14;77(8):173. doi: 10.5688/ajpe778173.
10
A Longitudinal Analysis of First Professional Year Pharmacy Student Well-being.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jul;84(7):ajpe7735. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7735.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of E-learning in pharmacy education.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 May 15;78(4):83. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78483.
2
Web 2.0 and pharmacy education.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Nov 12;73(7):120. doi: 10.5688/aj7307120.
3
Problem-based learning using the online Medicare Part D Plan Finder tool.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Jun 15;72(3):47. doi: 10.5688/aj720347.
4
Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention.
Age Ageing. 2006 Sep;35 Suppl 2:ii37-ii41. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl084.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验