Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, UK.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jun 2;75(6):1302-1311. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa017.
While a large body of evidence exists in support of outcomes associated with cumulative dis/advantage (CAD), individual-level experiences of the systemic processes that generate unequal outcomes have received far less attention. This study explored experiences, among members of an early baby-boom birth cohort, of CAD-generative processes within the education and housing systems and the mechanisms by which they interacted with initial social position to perpetuate inequalities.
The author conducted in-depth interviews (n = 27) with members of the Newcastle Thousand Families Study, a UK 1947 birth cohort. Longitudinal survey data enabled participant sampling on the basis of gender, occupational social class at birth and age 50, educational attainment and homeownership status at age 60. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Analysis identified two themes: Firstly, the sorting and funneling mechanisms by which the "meritocratic" education system interacted with initial social position, progressively narrowing aspirations and opportunities; and secondly, the creation in later life of winners and losers in the property market, resulting in legitimization of inequalities through a deservingness narrative.
CAD has proved persistent, even among the supposedly "lucky" early baby-boom cohort. Policies to ameliorate CAD generation through education and property systems act instead to entrench advantaged social positions. Later-life outcomes can be naturalized as the product of effort-plus-ability if not seen in a whole-life context. Disruption of CAD processes requires challenging vested interest inherent in social systems.
尽管有大量证据支持与累积劣势(CAD)相关的结果,但系统产生不平等结果的过程在个体层面上的经验却受到的关注要少得多。本研究探讨了在教育和住房系统中,具有早期婴儿潮出生队列的成员所经历的 CAD 生成过程,以及它们与初始社会地位相互作用以延续不平等的机制。
作者对英国 1947 年出生队列的纽卡斯尔千个家庭研究的成员进行了深入访谈(n=27)。纵向调查数据使参与者能够根据性别、出生时和 50 岁时的职业社会阶层、60 岁时的教育程度和住房拥有状况进行抽样。使用主题分析对定性数据进行了分析。
分析确定了两个主题:首先,“精英主义”教育系统与初始社会地位相互作用的分类和漏斗机制,逐渐缩小了抱负和机会;其次,在房地产市场中创造了后来的赢家和输家,通过值得性叙述使不平等合法化。
即使是在所谓的“幸运”的早期婴儿潮队列中,CAD 也被证明是持久存在的。通过教育和房地产系统来减轻 CAD 生成的政策反而会巩固有利的社会地位。如果不从整个人生的角度来看待,那么晚年的结果可能会被视为努力加能力的产物。要打破 CAD 过程,就需要挑战社会系统固有的既得利益。