Institute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Steno Diabetes Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Jun;22(6):904-915. doi: 10.1111/dom.13984. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
The guidance issued to the pharmaceutical industry by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2008 has led to the publication of a series of randomized, controlled cardiovascular outcomes trials with newer therapeutic classes of glucose-lowering medications. Several of these trials, which evaluated the newer therapeutic classes of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, have reported a reduced incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and/or renal outcomes, usually relative to placebo and standard of care. Metformin was the first glucose-lowering agent reported to improve cardiovascular outcomes in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and thus became the foundation of standard care. However, as this clinical trial reported more than 20 years ago, differences from current standards of trial design and evaluation complicate comparison of the cardiovascular profiles of older and newer agents. Our article revisits the evidence for cardiovascular protection with metformin and reviews its effects on the kidney.
美国食品和药物管理局在 2008 年向制药行业发布的指导意见,促成了一系列新型降糖药物的随机对照心血管结局试验的发表。其中几项试验评估了新型钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂治疗类别,报告了主要不良心血管和/或肾脏结局的发生率降低,通常与安慰剂和标准治疗相比。二甲双胍是第一个被报道能改善 UKPDS(英国前瞻性糖尿病研究)心血管结局的降糖药物,因此成为标准治疗的基础。然而,正如这项 20 多年前的临床试验所报道的那样,临床试验设计和评估的当前标准的差异使得比较新旧药物的心血管特征变得复杂。我们的文章重新审视了二甲双胍的心血管保护证据,并回顾了其对肾脏的影响。