Response: Commentary: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice.
作者信息
Trevethan Robert
机构信息
Independent Researcher, Albury, NSW, Australia.
出版信息
Front Public Health. 2020 Jan 14;7:408. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00408. eCollection 2019.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Response: Commentary: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice.
Front Public Health. 2020 Jan 14;7:408. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00408. eCollection 2019.
2
Commentary: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice.
Front Public Health. 2018 Sep 28;6:256. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00256. eCollection 2018.
3
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice.
Front Public Health. 2017 Nov 20;5:307. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00307. eCollection 2017.
4
Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 May 15;13(4):141-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1673.
5
Improving the diagnosis of bipolar disorder: predictive value of screening tests.
J Affect Disord. 2006 Jun;92(2-3):141-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.01.029. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
6
Correctly using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values in clinical practice: how to avoid three common pitfalls.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jun;200(6):W566-70. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9888.
7
The logistic modeling of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a diagnostic test.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jan;45(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90180-u.
8
Commentary on: Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. The diagnostic pitfalls of surveys: If you score positive on a test of addiction, you still have a good chance not to be addicted.
J Behav Addict. 2015 Sep;4(3):151-4. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.026.
9
Understanding diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.
Acta Paediatr. 2007 Mar;96(3):338-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00180.x.
10
[Comparison of the effect of three β-thalassemia prenatal screening strategies using in Guangdong province].
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jun;50(6):434-40.
引用本文的文献
1
Analysis of agreement between measures of subjective cognitive impairment and probable dementia in the National Health and Aging Trends Study.
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Apr;20(4):2817-2829. doi: 10.1002/alz.13758. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
2
Host transcriptional responses in nasal swabs identify potential SARS-CoV-2 infection in PCR negative patients.
iScience. 2022 Nov 18;25(11):105310. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105310. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
本文引用的文献
1
Commentary: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice.
Front Public Health. 2018 Sep 28;6:256. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00256. eCollection 2018.
2
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice.
Front Public Health. 2017 Nov 20;5:307. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00307. eCollection 2017.
3
Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions.
EJIFCC. 2009 Jan 20;19(4):203-11. eCollection 2009 Jan.
4
The time-efficiency principle: time as the key diagnostic strategy in primary care.
Fam Pract. 2013 Aug;30(4):386-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt007. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
Zotero 插件