de Souza Lucas André Schuster, Cancian Ana Carolina Maciel, de Castro Thiago Gomes, da Silva Oliveira Margareth
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Avenida Ipiranga, 6681, Prédio 11, 9° Andar, Sala 927, Partenon, Porto Alegre, RS, 90619-900, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2600-Sala 123, Rio Branco, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035003, Brazil.
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2019 Jan 15;32(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41155-019-0116-5.
Dialectical behavior therapy conceptualizes problematic behaviors as attempts to regulate emotions that occur when the individual lacks effective skills with which to manage his or her emotions and cope with distress. Problematic eating behaviors, e.g., binge and emotional eating, may serve to alleviate aversive emotional states, being highly associated with overweight and obesity. Dialectical behavior therapy skills training has been proven effective in reducing binge eating in several clinical studies. However, few studies reveal the effects of DBT on adaptive eating behaviors or the stability of outcomes.
This study aimed to test the effect of a brief DBT-based skills training intervention, and the stability of outcomes at 3- and 8-month follow-ups.
Self-report measures of binge eating, emotional eating, intuitive eating, and mindful eating were taken on 5 timepoints before and after a 10-session DBT skills training intervention (2 baseline measures, 1 post-test, and 2 follow-ups). Data were analyzed using a mixed-model intention-to-treat approach and mediation analysis was conducted with path analysis.
After the intervention, intuitive eating and mindful eating scores were significantly higher than before the intervention, while emotional eating and binge eating scores were lower. The results remained stable during the follow-up period, with minor fluctuations and small trends towards returning to baseline values for binge eating and emotional eating. Mindful eating partially mediated the improvements in all outcomes.
Given that results are entirely based on self-report measures and that some instruments showed poor reliability, in addition to the high attrition rates, the results should be interpreted as preliminary.
The results provide evidence that a brief DBT intervention is effective not only in reducing problematic eating but also in increasing adaptive eating, achieving reasonably stable results. Also, the mediation analysis results support the hypothesis that mindful eating partially explains the effects of the intervention on binge and emotional eating. Future research should address the limitations of this study by investigating a more diverse sample, triangulating different measurement strategies, and including other putative mediators.
辩证行为疗法将问题行为概念化为个体在缺乏有效管理情绪和应对困扰的技能时,为调节情绪而做出的尝试。问题性饮食行为,如暴饮暴食和情绪化进食,可能有助于缓解厌恶情绪状态,与超重和肥胖高度相关。在多项临床研究中,辩证行为疗法技能训练已被证明对减少暴饮暴食有效。然而,很少有研究揭示辩证行为疗法对适应性饮食行为的影响或结果的稳定性。
本研究旨在测试基于辩证行为疗法的简短技能训练干预的效果,以及在3个月和8个月随访时结果的稳定性。
在为期10节的辩证行为疗法技能训练干预前后的5个时间点,采用自我报告的方式测量暴饮暴食、情绪化进食、直觉性进食和正念进食情况(2次基线测量、1次测试后测量和2次随访)。使用混合模型意向性分析方法对数据进行分析,并通过路径分析进行中介分析。
干预后,直觉性进食和正念进食得分显著高于干预前,而情绪化进食和暴饮暴食得分较低。在随访期间,结果保持稳定,暴饮暴食和情绪化进食有轻微波动且有回归基线值的小趋势。正念进食部分介导了所有结果的改善。
鉴于结果完全基于自我报告测量,且一些工具显示可靠性较差,再加上高失访率,结果应被视为初步结果。
结果表明,简短的辩证行为疗法干预不仅对减少问题性饮食有效,而且对增加适应性饮食也有效,能取得相当稳定的结果。此外,中介分析结果支持以下假设:正念进食部分解释了干预对暴饮暴食和情绪化进食的影响。未来的研究应通过调查更多样化的样本、采用不同测量策略进行三角验证以及纳入其他假定中介变量来解决本研究的局限性。