• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针刺治疗餐后不适综合征:一项随机对照的初步试验。

Acupuncture for postprandial distress syndrome: a randomized controlled pilot trial.

机构信息

Acupuncture Research Center, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Acupunct Med. 2020 Oct;38(5):301-309. doi: 10.1177/0964528419900911. Epub 2020 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1177/0964528419900911
PMID:32028783
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence for treating postprandial distress syndrome with acupuncture is limited.

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of verum acupuncture versus sham acupuncture in patients with postprandial distress syndrome.

METHODS

A total of 42 eligible patients were randomly allocated to either verum acupuncture or sham acupuncture groups in a 1:1 ratio. Each patient received 12 sessions over 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the response rate based on the overall treatment effect (OTE) 4 weeks after randomization. Secondary outcomes included dyspepsia symptom severity and adverse events.

RESULTS

In each group, 19 patients (91.5%) completed the study. Thirteen patients receiving verum acupuncture and seven patients receiving sham acupuncture were classified as responders according to OTE (61.9% vs 33.3%; rate difference 28.6%;  = 0.06). Dyspepsia symptom severity at the end of treatment also differed significantly between verum acupuncture and sham acupuncture groups (5.9 units vs 3.7 units; between-group difference 2.2 (95% CI, 0.2-4.2);  = 0.04). No serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Four weeks of acupuncture may represent a potential treatment for postprandial distress syndrome. The treatment protocol and outcome measures used in this trial were feasible. Since this was a pilot study, the efficacy of acupuncture still needs to be determined by a larger, adequately powered trial.

摘要

背景

目前针对餐后不适综合征采用针刺治疗的证据有限。

目的

旨在评估真针刺与假针刺治疗餐后不适综合征患者的可行性。

方法

共纳入 42 例符合条件的患者,按照 1:1 的比例随机分配至真针刺组或假针刺组。每位患者接受 4 周、共 12 次的治疗。主要结局指标为随机分组后 4 周的总治疗效果(OTE)应答率。次要结局指标包括消化不良症状严重程度和不良事件。

结果

每组各有 19 例(91.5%)患者完成研究。根据 OTE,真针刺组有 13 例(61.9%)患者和假针刺组有 7 例(33.3%)患者被归类为应答者(差异率 28.6%;  = 0.06)。治疗结束时,真针刺组和假针刺组的消化不良症状严重程度也存在显著差异(5.9 单位比 3.7 单位;组间差异 2.2(95% CI,0.2-4.2);  = 0.04)。未发生严重不良事件。

结论

4 周的针刺治疗可能是餐后不适综合征的一种潜在治疗方法。本试验中使用的治疗方案和结局测量指标是可行的。由于这是一项初步研究,针刺的疗效仍需要更大规模、充分效能的试验来确定。

相似文献

1
Acupuncture for postprandial distress syndrome: a randomized controlled pilot trial.针刺治疗餐后不适综合征:一项随机对照的初步试验。
Acupunct Med. 2020 Oct;38(5):301-309. doi: 10.1177/0964528419900911. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
2
Efficacy of acupuncture versus sham acupuncture for postprandial distress syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针刺与假针刺治疗餐后不适综合征的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Jan 18;20(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3051-3.
3
Acupuncture for postprandial distress syndrome (APDS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针刺治疗餐后不适综合征(APDS):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Nov 13;18(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2285-9.
4
Acupuncture of different treatment frequency in postprandial distress syndrome: A pilot randomized clinical trial.不同治疗频率的针刺治疗餐后不适综合征的随机临床试验:一项初步研究。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Jun;32(6):e13812. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13812. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
5
Effect of Acupuncture for Postprandial Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针刺治疗餐后不适综合征的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 16;172(12):777-785. doi: 10.7326/M19-2880. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
[Improvement in dyspepsia related symptoms treated with acupuncture in 278 patients with postprandial distress syndrome: a secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial].278例餐后不适综合征患者接受针灸治疗后消化不良相关症状的改善:一项多中心随机对照试验的二次分析
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2021 Jun 12;41(6):583-7. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20200527-k0001.
7
Efficacy of compatible acupoints and single acupoint versus sham acupuncture for functional dyspepsia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.配穴与单穴针刺对照假针刺治疗功能性消化不良的疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jan 14;21(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3875-5.
8
Which subtype of functional dyspepsia patients responses better to acupuncture? A retrospective analysis of a randomized controlled trial.功能性消化不良的哪种亚型患者对针灸反应更好?一项随机对照试验的回顾性分析。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2015;22(2):94-100. doi: 10.1159/000380983. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
9
Effect of acupuncture and its influence on cerebral activity in functional dyspepsia patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针刺对功能性消化不良患者的影响及其对大脑活动的作用:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Apr 2;17:183. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1296-2.
10
Randomised clinical trial: an assessment of acupuncture on specific meridian or specific acupoint vs. sham acupuncture for treating functional dyspepsia.随机临床试验:评估针刺特定经络或特定穴位与假针刺治疗功能性消化不良的疗效。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Mar;35(5):552-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04979.x. Epub 2012 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Acupuncture improves the symptoms, serum ghrelin, and autonomic nervous system of patients with postprandial distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.针刺改善餐后不适综合征患者的症状、血清胃饥饿素及自主神经系统:一项随机对照试验。
Chin Med. 2024 Nov 20;19(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13020-024-01028-3.
2
Efficacy of Acupuncture Treatment for Postprandial Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针灸治疗餐后不适综合征的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Immunol Res. 2022 Jun 2;2022:6969960. doi: 10.1155/2022/6969960. eCollection 2022.