Yao Xiaoli, Guo Yueyue, Tu Yi, Yao Feng, Chen Chuang, Sun Shengrong, Zhang Xinghua
Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Gland Surg. 2019 Dec;8(6):773-783. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.12.17.
Our study compares the cosmetic effects, postoperative complications, and quality of life of immediate breast reconstruction with simple prosthesis or prosthesis plus titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TCPM) after total mastectomy for breast cancer.
In total, 69 patients who underwent total mastectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction from January 2015 to December 2018 in our hospital were selected, and their cosmetic effects, complications, and quality of life after reconstruction were recorded immediately after surgery and 6 months after surgery.
Of these 69 patients, 29 were in the simple prosthesis group and 40 in the prosthesis + TCPM group. The incidence of surgical complications was 17.2% in the simple prosthesis group (5/29; including 4 cases of capsular contracture and 1 case of infection) 15.0% in the prosthesis + TCPM group (6/40; 1 case of flap necrosis, 2 cases of poor wound healing, 2 cases of hematomas, and 1 case of inadequate blood supply to nipple). The complications were successfully managed after symptomatic treatment in both groups. No prosthesis loss was noted. The incidence of postoperative complications showed there to be no significant differences between these two groups (P=0.06, χ=0.80). The satisfaction rate of patients on cosmetic effects was 95.0% (38/40) in the prosthesis + TCPM group, significantly higher than that in the simple prosthesis group (75.90%, 22/29) (P=0.05, χ=3.87). The quality of life in the simple prosthesis group at 2 weeks and six months after the operation was significantly lower than that in the prosthesis + TCPM group. The incidence rate of arm pain and fatigue at 2 weeks after operation was significantly higher than that in the prosthesis + TCPM group (P=0.04, χ=4.42). The satisfaction of family life and sexual interest 6 months after the operation was also significantly lower in the simple prosthesis group than in the prosthesis + TCPM group (P=0.03, χ=4.95).
Breast reconstruction with prosthesis combined with TCPM does not increase surgical complications and has a good cosmetic effect and high patient satisfaction. Thus, it is a safe and reconstruction method.
我们的研究比较了乳腺癌全乳切除术后单纯假体或假体加钛涂层聚丙烯网(TCPM)即刻乳房重建的美容效果、术后并发症及生活质量。
选取2015年1月至2018年12月在我院接受全乳切除、前哨淋巴结活检及即刻假体乳房重建的69例患者,记录其术后即刻及术后6个月的重建美容效果、并发症及生活质量。
这69例患者中,单纯假体组29例,假体+TCPM组40例。单纯假体组手术并发症发生率为17.2%(5/29;包括4例包膜挛缩和1例感染),假体+TCPM组为15.0%(6/40;1例皮瓣坏死、2例伤口愈合不良、2例血肿和1例乳头血供不足)。两组经对症治疗后并发症均得到成功处理。未发现假体丢失情况。术后并发症发生率显示两组之间无显著差异(P=0.06,χ=0.80)。假体+TCPM组患者对美容效果的满意率为95.0%(38/40),显著高于单纯假体组(75.90%,22/29)(P=0.05,χ=3.87)。单纯假体组术后2周和6个月时的生活质量显著低于假体+TCPM组。术后2周时手臂疼痛和疲劳的发生率显著高于假体+TCPM组(P=0.04,χ=4.42)。术后6个月时单纯假体组家庭生活满意度和性兴趣也显著低于假体+TCPM组(P=0.03,χ=4.95)。
假体联合TCPM进行乳房重建不会增加手术并发症,具有良好的美容效果和较高的患者满意度。因此,这是一种安全的重建方法。