Lu Xiaona, Forte Antonio Jorge, Steinbacher Derek M, Alperovich Michael, Alonso Nivaldo, Persing John A
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL.
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 May/Jun;31(3):673-677. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006181.
Based on an established classification system of Crouzon syndrome subtypes, detailed regional morphology and volume analysis may be useful, to clarify Crouzon cranial structure characteristics, and the interaction between suture fusion and gene regulated overall growth of the calvarium and basicranium.
CT scans of 36 unoperated Crouzon syndrome patients and 56 controls were included and subgrouped as: type I. Bilateral coronal synostosis; type II. Sagittal synostosis; type III. Pansynostosis; type IV. Perpendicular combination synostosis.
Type I of Crouzon syndrome patients developed a slightly smaller posterior fossa (22%), and increased superior cranial volume (13%), which is the only subtype that develops a greater superior cranial volume. The effect of competing increased and decreased segmental volume is associated with a 24% enlargement of overall cranial volume (P = 0.321). In class III, the anterior fossa volume was increased by 31% (P = 0.007), while the volume of posterior fossa was decreased by 19% (P < 0.001). These resulted in a 7% (P = 0.046) reduction in the overall intracranial volume. Type II and type IV patients developed a trend toward anterior, middle, and posterior fossae, and entire cranial volume reduction.
Pansynostosis is the most often form of associated craniosynostoses of Crouzon syndrome, however bilateral coronal synostosis may not dominate this form of Crouzon syndrome. The anterior, middle and posterior cranial fossae may have simultaneously reduced volume if the midline suture synostosis is involved. Individualized treatment planning for Crouzon syndrome patient, theoretically should include the patient's age and temporal associated maldevelopment suture sequence.
基于已建立的克鲁宗综合征亚型分类系统,详细的区域形态学和体积分析可能有助于阐明克鲁宗颅骨结构特征,以及缝合融合与基因调控的颅盖和颅底整体生长之间的相互作用。
纳入36例未经手术的克鲁宗综合征患者和56例对照的CT扫描,并分为以下亚组:I型。双侧冠状缝早闭;II型。矢状缝早闭;III型。全颅缝早闭;IV型。垂直联合缝早闭。
I型克鲁宗综合征患者后颅窝稍小(22%),颅上部分体积增加(13%),这是唯一一种颅上部分体积增大的亚型。节段性体积增减相互竞争的效应导致总体颅体积增大24%(P = 0.321)。在III类中,前颅窝体积增加31%(P = 0.007),而后颅窝体积减少19%(P < 0.001)。这些导致总体颅内体积减少7%(P = 0.046)。II型和IV型患者前、中、后颅窝及整个颅体积有减小趋势。
全颅缝早闭是克鲁宗综合征相关颅缝早闭最常见的形式,然而双侧冠状缝早闭可能并不主导这种形式的克鲁宗综合征。如果涉及中线缝早闭,前、中、后颅窝可能同时体积减小。理论上,克鲁宗综合征患者的个体化治疗计划应包括患者年龄和颞部相关发育异常的缝序列。