Suppr超能文献

一项随机二期临床试验,旨在比较不同剂量 MVA-BN 天花疫苗在有艾滋病病史的成年人中的安全性和免疫原性。

A randomized phase II trial to compare safety and immunogenicity of the MVA-BN smallpox vaccine at various doses in adults with a history of AIDS.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2020 Mar 4;38(11):2600-2607. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.058. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

Abstract

Traditional replicating smallpox vaccines are associated with serious safety concerns in the general population and are contraindicated in immunocompromised individuals. However, this very population remains at greatest risk for severe complications following viral infections, making vaccine prevention particularly relevant. MVA-BN was developed as a non-replicating smallpox vaccine that is potentially safer for people who are immunocompromised. In this phase II trial, 3 MVA-BN dosing regimens were evaluated for safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity in persons with HIV (PWH) who had a history of AIDS. Following randomization, 87 participants who were predominately male and African American received either 2 standard doses on weeks 0 and 4 in the standard dose (SD) group (N = 27), 2 double-standard doses on the same schedule in the double dose (DD) group (N = 29), or 3 standard doses on weeks 0, 4 and 12 in the booster dose (BD) group (N = 31). No safety concerns were identified, and injection site pain was the most commonly reported solicited adverse event (AE) in all groups (66.7%), with no meaningful differences between groups. The incidence of severe (Grade 3) AEs was low across groups and no serious AEs or AEs of special interest considered related to study vaccine were reported. Doubling the standard MVA-BN dose had no significant effect on induction of neutralizing antibodies, with 100% seroconversion and comparable GMTs at week 6 in the SD and DD groups (78.9 and 100.3, respectively). A booster dose significantly increased peak neutralizing titers in the BD group (GMT: 281.1), which remained elevated at 12 months (GMT: 45.3) compared to the SD (GMT: 6.2) and DD (GMT: 10.6) groups. However, based on the immune response previously reported for healthy participants, a third dose (booster) does not appear necessary, even for immunocompromised participants. Clinical Trial Registry Number: NCT02038881.

摘要

传统复制型天花疫苗在普通人群中存在严重的安全性问题,并且在免疫功能低下的个体中禁用。然而,由于这些人群在病毒感染后发生严重并发症的风险最大,因此疫苗预防特别重要。MVA-BN 是作为一种非复制型天花疫苗开发的,对于免疫功能低下的人群可能更安全。在这项 II 期试验中,评估了 3 种 MVA-BN 剂量方案在有艾滋病病史的 HIV 感染者(PWH)中的安全性、耐受性和免疫原性。随机分组后,87 名参与者主要为男性和非裔美国人,分别在标准剂量(SD)组(n=27)的第 0 周和第 4 周接受 2 剂标准剂量,在双剂量(DD)组(n=29)接受相同方案的 2 剂双倍剂量,或在加强剂量(BD)组(n=31)的第 0 周、第 4 周和第 12 周接受 3 剂标准剂量。未发现安全性问题,注射部位疼痛是所有组中最常见的不良事件(AE)(66.7%),各组之间无明显差异。各组严重(3 级)AE 的发生率均较低,且未报告与研究疫苗相关的严重 AE 或特殊关注的 AE。将标准 MVA-BN 剂量加倍对诱导中和抗体没有显著影响,SD 和 DD 组在第 6 周时的血清转化率均为 100%,GMT 分别为 78.9 和 100.3(分别)。加强剂量可显著提高 BD 组的峰值中和滴度(GMT:281.1),与 SD 组(GMT:6.2)和 DD 组(GMT:10.6)相比,12 个月时仍保持较高水平(GMT:45.3)。然而,根据先前针对健康参与者报告的免疫反应,即使对于免疫功能低下的参与者,也不需要第三剂(加强剂)。临床试验注册号:NCT02038881。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验