• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗补助制度中的共付政策与乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查

Co-payment policies and breast and cervical cancer screening in Medicaid.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, 130 De Soto St, A613, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2020 Feb;26(2):69-74. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42395.

DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2020.42395
PMID:32059094
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8011838/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the relationship between state Medicaid co-payment policies and cancer screening for Medicaid-enrolled women.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of administrative claims and enrollment data.

METHODS

Our data included Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) outpatient claims files across 43 states in 2003, 2008, and 2010, the years for which both MAX data and state cost-sharing data were available. Data on enrollee demographics and screening services from enrollment and claims files were merged with state-year data on co-payment policies and county-level controls from the Area Health Resources File. Participants were nonelderly, nondisabled, nonpregnant women in the recommended age range for each screening service (50-64 years for mammograms; 21-64 years for Pap tests) enrolled in fee-for-service Medicaid. The main independent variable is whether an enrollee faced cost sharing for preventive services. We examined 3 categories of cost sharing: co-payments for all visits, including for preventive services; co-payments for outpatient visits but waived for preventive services; and no co-payments. The main outcome measure was receipt of mammogram or Pap test within a 12-month period.

RESULTS

Medicaid enrollees with co-payments for preventive services were less likely to receive both screening mammograms and Pap tests than enrollees in states not requiring cost sharing for preventive services.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-payments for preventive services discourage breast and cervical cancer screening among Medicaid enrollees. The effect is larger for breast cancer screening, which is costlier and requires an additional visit. Considering this evidence, cost sharing for preventive services may lead to adverse health consequences and greater long-term costs.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了州医疗补助共付政策与医疗补助参保妇女癌症筛查之间的关系。

研究设计

对行政索赔和登记数据进行横断面分析。

方法

我们的数据包括 2003 年、2008 年和 2010 年 43 个州的医疗补助分析提取(MAX)门诊索赔文件,这三年均提供了 MAX 数据和州共付数据。从登记和索赔文件中获取参保人人口统计和筛查服务数据,并与来自区域卫生资源文件的州-年共付政策和县一级控制数据合并。参与者是非老年、非残疾、非怀孕的符合每个筛查服务推荐年龄范围的妇女(50-64 岁接受乳房 X 光检查;21-64 岁接受巴氏试验),参加按服务收费的医疗补助。主要的独立变量是参保人是否需要为预防服务支付费用。我们考察了 3 种共付类型:所有就诊的共付,包括预防服务;仅为门诊就诊支付共付,但为预防服务豁免;以及不支付共付。主要的结果测量是在 12 个月内接受乳房 X 光检查或巴氏试验。

结果

与不要求为预防服务支付费用的州相比,需要为预防服务支付共付的医疗补助参保人接受乳房 X 光检查和巴氏试验的可能性较低。

结论

预防服务的共付费用阻碍了医疗补助参保人的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查。对于成本更高且需要额外就诊的乳腺癌筛查,其效果更大。考虑到这一证据,预防服务的共付可能会导致不良健康后果和更高的长期成本。

相似文献

1
Co-payment policies and breast and cervical cancer screening in Medicaid.医疗补助制度中的共付政策与乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Feb;26(2):69-74. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42395.
2
Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Beneficiaries: The Role of Physician Payment and Managed Care.医疗补助受益人群的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查:医生薪酬和管理式医疗的作用。
Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Feb;77(1):34-45. doi: 10.1177/1077558718771123. Epub 2018 May 4.
3
Effectiveness of Medicare cost-sharing elimination for Cancer screening on utilization.医疗保险消除癌症筛查费用分担对利用率的有效性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 17;19(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4135-9.
4
Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Patterns Among Women With Medicaid and Commercial Insurance.乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查:有医疗补助和商业保险的女性中的模式。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Sep;57(3):394-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
5
Use of cervical cancer preventive services among US women aged 21-29: an assessment of the 2010 Affordable Care Act rollout through 2018.美国21至29岁女性宫颈癌预防服务的使用情况:对2010年《平价医疗法案》至2018年推行情况的评估
Cancer Causes Control. 2020 Sep;31(9):839-850. doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01325-w. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
6
Impact of state-specific Medicaid reimbursement and eligibility policies on receipt of cancer screening.州内医疗补助报销和资格政策对癌症筛查的影响。
Cancer. 2014 Oct 1;120(19):3016-24. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28704. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
7
State Medicaid expansion decisions and disparities in women's cancer screening.州医疗补助扩大计划决策与女性癌症筛查的差异
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.015. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
8
Prevalence of Out-Of-Pocket Payments for Mammography Screening Among Recently Screened Women.最近接受过乳房 X 光筛查的女性中,自费进行乳房 X 光筛查的比例。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jul;28(7):910-918. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6973. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
9
Health Reform, Medicaid Expansions, and Women's Cancer Screening.医疗改革、医疗补助扩大与女性癌症筛查
Womens Health Issues. 2016 May-Jun;26(3):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
10
Evaluating the effect of Medicaid expansion on access to preventive reproductive care for women in Oregon.评估俄勒冈州医疗补助扩张计划对女性获得预防性生殖保健的影响。
Prev Med. 2020 Jan;130:105899. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105899. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Social determinants of health and health inequities in breast cancer screening: a scoping review.社会决定因素与乳腺癌筛查中的健康不平等:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;12:1354717. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1354717. eCollection 2024.
2
Availability of Financial and Medical Resources for Screening Providers and Its Impact on Cancer Screening Uptake and Intervention Programs.筛查提供方的财务和医疗资源的可及性及其对癌症筛查率和干预计划的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 12;19(18):11477. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811477.
3
Medicaid Expansions: Probing Medicaid's Filling of the Cancer Genetic Testing and Screening Space.医疗补助计划扩张:探究医疗补助计划在癌症基因检测与筛查领域的填补情况。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 8;10(6):1066. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061066.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Beneficiaries: The Role of Physician Payment and Managed Care.医疗补助受益人群的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查:医生薪酬和管理式医疗的作用。
Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Feb;77(1):34-45. doi: 10.1177/1077558718771123. Epub 2018 May 4.
2
Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography Screening Effectiveness.乳腺癌肿瘤大小、过度诊断与乳腺 X 线筛查效果
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1438-1447. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600249.
3
Predictors of Participation in Mammography Screening among Non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic White, and Hispanic Women.非西班牙裔黑种人、非西班牙裔白种人和西班牙裔妇女参与乳房 X 光筛查的预测因素。
Front Public Health. 2016 Sep 6;4:188. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00188. eCollection 2016.
4
Cost Sharing in Medicaid: Assumptions, Evidence, and Future Directions.医疗补助计划中的费用分担:假设、证据及未来方向。
Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Aug;73(4):383-409. doi: 10.1177/1077558715617381. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
5
Copayments and Emergency Department Use Among Adult Medicaid Enrollees.成年医疗补助计划参保者的自付费用与急诊科就诊情况
Health Econ. 2016 May;25(5):529-42. doi: 10.1002/hec.3164. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
6
Impact of state-specific Medicaid reimbursement and eligibility policies on receipt of cancer screening.州内医疗补助报销和资格政策对癌症筛查的影响。
Cancer. 2014 Oct 1;120(19):3016-24. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28704. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
7
Pinching the poor? Medicaid cost sharing under the ACA.压榨穷人?《平价医疗法案》下的医疗补助费用分担
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 27;370(13):1177-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1316370.
8
The impact of patient cost-sharing on low-income populations: evidence from Massachusetts.患者成本分担对低收入人群的影响:来自马萨诸塞州的证据。
J Health Econ. 2014 Jan;33:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
9
Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence.三十年来乳腺 X 线筛查对乳腺癌发病率的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 22;367(21):1998-2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206809.
10
Prevention of invasive cervical cancer in the United States: past, present, and future.美国预防宫颈癌:过去、现在和未来。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Sep;21(9):1402-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1158. Epub 2012 May 3.