Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, Italy.
Metabolism. 2020 Apr;105:154185. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154185. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Uncertainty still exists on the earliest beta-cell defects at the bases of the type 2 diabetes. We assume that this depends on the inaccurate distinction between fasting and post-load glucose homeostasis and aim at providing a description of major beta-cell functions across the full physiologic spectrum of each condition.
In 1320 non-diabetic individuals we performed an OGTT with insulin secretion modeling and a euglycemic insulin clamp, coupled in subgroups to glucose tracers and IVGTT; 1038 subjects underwent another OGTT after 3.5 years. Post-load glucose homeostasis was defined as mean plasma glucose above fasting levels (δOGTT). The analysis was performed by two-way ANCOVA.
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and δOGTT were weakly related variables (stβ = 0.12) as were their changes over time (r = -0.08). Disruption of FPG control was associated with an isolated and progressive decline (approaching 60%) of the sensitivity of the beta-cell to glucose values within the normal fasting range. Disruption of post-load glucose control was characterized by a progressive decline (approaching 60%) of the slope of the full beta-cell vs glucose dose-response curve and an early minor (30%) decline of potentiation. The acute dynamic beta-cell responses, neither per se nor in relation to the degree of insulin resistance appeared to play a relevant role in disruption of fasting or post-load homeostasis. Follow-up data qualitatively and quantitatively confirmed the results of the cross-sectional analysis.
In normal subjects fasting and post-load glucose homeostasis are largely independent, and their disruption is sustained by different and specific beta-cell defects.
背景/目的:2 型糖尿病基础上最早的β细胞缺陷仍存在不确定性。我们假设这取决于空腹和负荷后葡萄糖稳态之间的不准确区分,并旨在提供在每种情况下的整个生理谱中主要β细胞功能的描述。
在 1320 名非糖尿病个体中,我们进行了口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT),并进行了胰岛素分泌建模和正葡萄糖胰岛素钳夹,在亚组中与葡萄糖示踪剂和静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(IVGTT)相结合;1038 名受试者在 3.5 年后再次进行 OGTT。负荷后葡萄糖稳态定义为空腹水平以上的平均血浆葡萄糖(δOGTT)。分析通过双向方差分析(ANCOVA)进行。
空腹血糖(FPG)和 δOGTT 是弱相关变量(stβ=0.12),它们随时间的变化也是如此(r=-0.08)。FPG 控制的破坏与β细胞对正常空腹范围内葡萄糖值的敏感性的孤立和进行性下降(接近 60%)相关。负荷后葡萄糖控制的破坏特征是整个β细胞与葡萄糖剂量反应曲线的斜率进行性下降(接近 60%),以及早期较小的(30%)增强下降。急性动态β细胞反应,无论是本身还是与胰岛素抵抗的程度无关,似乎在破坏空腹或负荷后稳态方面没有发挥相关作用。随访数据在定性和定量上都证实了横断面分析的结果。
在正常个体中,空腹和负荷后葡萄糖稳态在很大程度上是独立的,其破坏由不同和特定的β细胞缺陷维持。