Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610;
School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 3;117(9):4617-4622. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916169117. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
Studies of small-scale, self-organized social-ecological systems have contributed to our understanding of successful governance of shared resources. However, the lack of formal analytically tractable models of such coupled infrastructure systems makes it difficult to connect this understanding to such concepts as stability, robustness, and resilience, which are increasingly important in considering such systems. In this paper, we mathematically operationalize a widely used conceptual framework via a stylized dynamical model. The model yields a wide range of system outcomes: sustainability or collapse, infrastructure at full or partial capacity, and social agents seeking outside opportunities or exclusively engaging in the system. The low dimensionality of the model enables us to derive these conditions in clear relationships of biophysical and social factors describing the coupled system. Analysis of the model further reveals regime shifts, trade-offs, and potential pitfalls that one may face in governing these self-organized systems. The intuition and insights derived from the model lay ground for more rigorous treatment of robustness and resilience of self-organized coupled infrastructure systems, which can lead to more effective governance.
小规模自组织的社会-生态系统研究有助于我们理解共享资源的成功治理。然而,由于缺乏对这类耦合基础设施系统的正式、可分析的处理模型,因此很难将这种理解与稳定性、鲁棒性和弹性等概念联系起来,这些概念在考虑这类系统时变得越来越重要。在本文中,我们通过一个风格化的动力模型,对一个广泛使用的概念框架进行了数学运算。该模型产生了广泛的系统结果:可持续性或崩溃、基础设施处于满负荷或部分容量、以及寻求外部机会或完全参与系统的社会代理。该模型的低维性使我们能够根据描述耦合系统的生物物理和社会因素的清晰关系推导出这些条件。对模型的进一步分析揭示了在管理这些自组织系统时可能面临的制度转变、权衡取舍和潜在陷阱。该模型所获得的直觉和见解为更严格地处理自组织耦合基础设施系统的鲁棒性和弹性奠定了基础,从而可以实现更有效的治理。