• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸外颈股静脉分流术能否在格林双向分流手术中避免体外循环?

Does Extrathoracic Jugulo-Femoral Venous Shunt Avoid Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Glenn Bi-Directional Shunt Procedure?

作者信息

Elbaser Ibrahim Ibrahim Abd, El Derie Ahmad Abd El Aleem

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

出版信息

Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020 Feb;48(1):44-49. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.32956. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

DOI:10.5152/TJAR.2019.32956
PMID:32076679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7001807/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of extrathoracic jugulo-femoral venous shunt (JFVS) in avoiding the need for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during the bi-directional Glenn shunt (BDGS) procedure.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients aged between 9 and 36 months were enrolled in the present study. The patients were classified into two groups, group A (n=20) in which the patients had no veno-venous shunt and group B (n=20) in which the patients had extrathoracic JFVS. Patients requiring CPB, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO), heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and central venous pressure (CVP) were recorded during surgery. Postoperative time of intubation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stays and neurological complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

The number of patients who needed urgent CPB was greater in group A than in group B. Intraoperative MAP was significantly lower in group A than in group B 10 min after clamping of the superior vena cava (SVC) and 30 min after declamping of the SVC. The CVP was significantly lower, and arterial SaO was significantly higher in group B than in group A 10 min after clamping of the SVC. The duration of postoperative intubation was significantly shorter in group B than in group A, and the ICU length of stay was shorter in group B than in group A. The hospital length of stay was similar in both groups. Postoperative neurological deficits were comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of extrathoracic JFVS during the BDGS procedure avoided the use of CPB, maintained MAP and prevented any significant increase in SVC pressure.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估胸外颈股静脉分流术(JFVS)在双向格林分流术(BDGS)过程中避免使用体外循环(CPB)的疗效。

方法

本研究共纳入40例年龄在9至36个月之间的患者。患者被分为两组,A组(n = 20)患者未进行静脉 - 静脉分流,B组(n = 20)患者进行胸外JFVS。记录手术期间需要CPB的患者、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO)、心率、平均动脉压(MAP)和中心静脉压(CVP)。还记录术后插管时间、重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间以及神经并发症。

结果

A组需要紧急CPB的患者数量多于B组。在夹闭上腔静脉(SVC)后10分钟和松开SVC后30分钟,A组术中MAP显著低于B组。在夹闭SVC后10分钟,B组CVP显著低于A组,动脉SaO显著高于A组。B组术后插管持续时间显著短于A组,ICU住院时间短于A组。两组住院时间相似。两组术后神经功能缺损情况相当。

结论

在BDGS手术中使用胸外JFVS避免了CPB的使用,维持了MAP并防止SVC压力显著升高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1358/7001807/63e53e425d3f/TARD-48-1-44-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1358/7001807/ff21e4fe5a6f/TARD-48-1-44-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1358/7001807/002e7ceef48c/TARD-48-1-44-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1358/7001807/ca73c3dadaab/TARD-48-1-44-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1358/7001807/63e53e425d3f/TARD-48-1-44-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1358/7001807/ff21e4fe5a6f/TARD-48-1-44-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1358/7001807/002e7ceef48c/TARD-48-1-44-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1358/7001807/ca73c3dadaab/TARD-48-1-44-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1358/7001807/63e53e425d3f/TARD-48-1-44-g04.jpg

相似文献

1
Does Extrathoracic Jugulo-Femoral Venous Shunt Avoid Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Glenn Bi-Directional Shunt Procedure?胸外颈股静脉分流术能否在格林双向分流手术中避免体外循环?
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020 Feb;48(1):44-49. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.32956. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
2
Novel techniques of bidirectional Glenn shunt without cardiopulmonary bypass.无体外循环的双向格林分流新技术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Jun;67(6):1771-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00278-7.
3
Vacuum-assisted venous drainage in extrathoracic cardiopulmonary bypass management during minimally invasive cardiac surgery.微创心脏手术中体外循环管理的真空辅助静脉引流
Perfusion. 2006 Nov;21(6):361-5. doi: 10.1177/0267659106071324.
4
Cavopulmonary anastomosis without cardiopulmonary bypass.非体外循环下的腔肺吻合术。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 May;16(5):649-53. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs518. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
5
Bidirectional Glenn operation without cardiopulmonary bypass: Single center experience and results.双向格林手术不使用体外循环:单中心经验与结果。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2024 Jan;32(1):5-10. doi: 10.1177/02184923231213010. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
6
Veno-venous shunt-assisted cavopulmonary anastomosis.静脉-静脉分流辅助的腔肺吻合术
Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2010 Jan;3(1):8-11. doi: 10.4103/0974-2069.64361.
7
Bidirectional Glenn on cardiopulmonary bypass: A comparison of three techniques.体外循环下双向格林手术:三种技术的比较
J Card Surg. 2017 May;32(5):303-309. doi: 10.1111/jocs.13123. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
8
The bidirectional cavopulmonary (Glenn) shunt without cardiopulmonary bypass: is it a safe option?非体外循环下双向腔肺分流术(格林分流术):它是一个安全的选择吗?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007 Feb;6(1):77-82. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2006.133710. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
9
Cerebral ischemia caused by obstructed superior vena cava cannula is detected by near-infrared spectroscopy.通过近红外光谱法检测上腔静脉插管阻塞引起的脑缺血。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004 Jun;18(3):293-303. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.03.008.
10
Bidirectional superior cavopulmonary anastomosis with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: A randomized study.体外循环下或非体外循环下双向腔肺吻合术:一项随机研究。
J Card Surg. 2017 Jun;32(6):376-381. doi: 10.1111/jocs.13149. Epub 2017 May 21.

本文引用的文献

1
The bidirectional Glenn shunt for univentricular hearts.用于单心室心脏的双向格林分流术。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Oct;34(4):453-456. doi: 10.1007/s12055-018-0653-z. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
2
Superior vena cava clamping during thoracic surgery: Implications for the anesthesiologist.胸外科手术中 superior vena cava clamping(上腔静脉阻断):对麻醉医生的影响。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2018 Jan-Mar;21(1):85-87. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_125_17.
3
Placement of a modified cannula in the innominate vein for sufficient drainage during the bidirectional Glenn shunt procedure without cardiopulmonary bypass.
在双向格林分流手术中,在无名静脉放置改良插管,以便在不进行体外循环的情况下实现充分引流。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Oct 27;10:134. doi: 10.1186/s13019-015-0341-7.
4
Superior vena caval resection in lung cancer.肺癌的上腔静脉切除术
Thorac Surg Clin. 2014 Nov;24(4):441-7. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
5
Regulation of cerebral autoregulation by carbon dioxide.二氧化碳对脑自动调节的调节作用。
Anesthesiology. 2015 Jan;122(1):196-205. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000506.
6
Short and long-term outcomes for bidirectional glenn procedure performed with and without cardiopulmonary bypass.双向 Glenn 手术在体外循环和非体外循环下的短期和长期结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jul;94(1):164-70; discussion 170-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 May 4.
7
Veno-venous shunt-assisted cavopulmonary anastomosis.静脉-静脉分流辅助的腔肺吻合术
Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2010 Jan;3(1):8-11. doi: 10.4103/0974-2069.64361.
8
Clinical application of bidirectional Glenn shunt with off-pump technique.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2004 Jun;12(2):103-6. doi: 10.1177/021849230401200204.