Coşgun Tuğba, Kaba Erkan, Ayalp Kemal, Toker Alper
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Demiroğlu Bilim University, Şişli Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2019 Oct 23;27(4):521-525. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2019.17315. eCollection 2019 Oct.
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of lobectomy operations without using a stapler for bronchial closure.
Between December 2014 and August 2018, a total of 108 patients (72 males, 36 females; mean age 62.1±9.8 years; range, 19 to 83 years) with primary lung cancer who underwent lobar resection with robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were included in this study. Primary bronchial closure (n=7) and sleeve anastomosis (n=9) were performed in some cases. These 16 patients were compared with other lobectomy cases (n=92) who had bronchial stapling for bronchial closure.
There was no statistically significant difference in the mean duration of operation, amount of intraoperative bleeding, length of postoperative stay in the hospital, and morbidity and readmission rates between the two groups (p=0.3, p=0.5, p=0.06, p=0.4, and p=0.63, respectively). No bronchial fistula developed in any of the patients.
Primary bronchial closure and sleeve anastomosis can be safely performed with robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery without conversion to thoracotomy, or a larger assistance incision with a similar success rate of the stapled bronchus.
本研究旨在评估不使用吻合器进行支气管闭合的肺叶切除术的可行性及手术效果。
2014年12月至2018年8月期间,本研究纳入了108例行机器人辅助胸腔镜手术肺叶切除的原发性肺癌患者(男性72例,女性36例;平均年龄62.1±9.8岁;范围19至83岁)。部分病例采用了原发性支气管闭合术(n = 7)和袖状吻合术(n = 9)。将这16例患者与其他92例行支气管吻合器闭合支气管的肺叶切除病例进行比较。
两组患者的平均手术时长、术中出血量、术后住院时间、发病率及再入院率差异均无统计学意义(p值分别为0.3、0.5、0.06、0.4和0.63)。所有患者均未发生支气管瘘。
原发性支气管闭合术和袖状吻合术可在机器人辅助胸腔镜手术中安全实施,无需转为开胸手术或扩大辅助切口,且支气管吻合成功率与使用吻合器相似。