Suppr超能文献

一种综合疼痛治疗团队模式:对慢性疼痛患者疼痛相关结局及阿片类药物滥用的影响

An Integrated Pain Team Model: Impact on Pain-Related Outcomes and Opioid Misuse in Patients with Chronic Pain.

作者信息

Gibson Carolyn J, Grasso Joseph, Li Yongmei, Purcell Natalie, Tighe Jennifer, Zamora Kara, Nicosia Francesca, Seal Karen H

机构信息

San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California.

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2020 Sep 1;21(9):1977-1984. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Biopsychosocial integrated pain team (IPT) care models are being implemented in Veterans Health Administration (VA) and other health care systems to address chronic pain and reduce risks related to long-term opioid therapy, with little evaluation of effectiveness to date. We examined whether IPT improves self-reported pain-related outcomes and opioid misuse.

DESIGN

Single-group quality improvement study.

SETTING

Large VA health care system.

SUBJECTS

Veterans with chronic pain (N = 99, 84% male, mean age [SD] = 60 [13] years).

METHODS

Using paired t tests and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks tests, we examined pain experience (Brief Pain Inventory, Pain Catastrophizing Scale), opioid misuse (Current Opioid Misuse Measure), treatment satisfaction (Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale), and pain management strategies among patients with chronic pain before and after three or more IPT encounters.

RESULTS

After an average (SD) of 14.3 (9) weeks engaged in IPT, patients reported improvement in pain interference (mean [SD] = 46.0 [15.9] vs 40.5 [16.2], P < 0.001), pain catastrophizing (mean [SD] = 22.9 [13.0] vs 19.3 [14.1], P = 0.01), treatment satisfaction (i.e., "very satisfied" = 13.1% at baseline vs 25.3% at follow-up, P = 0.01), and reduced opioid misuse (mean [SD] = 11.0 [7.5] vs 8.2 [6.1], P = 0.01). Patients reported increased use of integrative (i.e., acupuncture, 11% at baseline vs 26% at follow-up, P < 0.01) and active pain management strategies (i.e., exercise, 8% at baseline vs 16% at follow-up, P < 0.01) and were less likely to use only pharmacological pain management strategies after IPT engagement (19% at baseline vs 5% at follow-up, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Biopsychosocial, integrated pain care may improve patient-centered outcomes related to opioid misuse and the subjective experience and nonpharmacological self-management of chronic pain.

摘要

目的

退伍军人健康管理局(VA)和其他医疗系统正在实施生物心理社会综合疼痛治疗团队(IPT)护理模式,以解决慢性疼痛问题并降低长期阿片类药物治疗相关风险,但迄今为止对其有效性的评估很少。我们研究了IPT是否能改善自我报告的疼痛相关结局和阿片类药物滥用情况。

设计

单组质量改进研究。

地点

大型VA医疗系统。

研究对象

慢性疼痛退伍军人(N = 99,84%为男性,平均年龄[标准差]=60[13]岁)。

方法

我们使用配对t检验和Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验,研究了99例慢性疼痛患者在接受三次或更多次IPT治疗前后的疼痛体验(简明疼痛量表、疼痛灾难化量表)、阿片类药物滥用情况(当前阿片类药物滥用测量量表)、治疗满意度(疼痛治疗满意度量表)和疼痛管理策略。

结果

在平均(标准差)14.3(9)周的IPT治疗后,患者报告疼痛干扰有所改善(平均[标准差]=46.0[15.9]对40.5[16.2],P<0.001)、疼痛灾难化程度降低(平均[标准差]=22.9[13.0]对19.3[14.1],P = 0.01)、治疗满意度提高(即“非常满意”:基线时为13.1%,随访时为25.3%,P = 0.01),且阿片类药物滥用减少(平均[标准差]=11.0[7.5]对8.2[6.1],P = 0.01)。患者报告综合治疗(如针灸,基线时为11%,随访时为26%,P<0.01)和积极疼痛管理策略(如运动,基线时为8%,随访时为16%,P<0.01)的使用增加,并且在接受IPT治疗后仅使用药物疼痛管理策略的可能性降低(基线时为19%,随访时为5%,P<0.01)。

结论

生物心理社会综合疼痛护理可能改善与阿片类药物滥用以及慢性疼痛的主观体验和非药物自我管理相关的以患者为中心的结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验