Suppr超能文献

髋关节运动步态中超声成像得出的臀肌厚度与髋关节生物力学的互相关分析。

Cross-correlations between gluteal muscle thickness derived from ultrasound imaging and hip biomechanics during walking gait.

机构信息

University of Virginia Exercise and Sports Injury Lab, 210 Emmet Street South, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4407, USA.

Texas State University Biomechanics/Sports Medicine Lab, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666-4616, USA.

出版信息

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2020 Apr;51:102406. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102406. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging (USI) of muscle thickness offers different insights into musculoskeletal function than kinematics, kinetics, and surface electromyography (sEMG), however it is unknown how USI-derived measures correlate to traditional measures during walking. The purpose of this study was to compare USI-derived gluteus maximus (GMAX) and medius (GMED) thickness measures to tri-planar hip kinematics and kinetics, and GMED thickness to sEMG amplitude. Fourteen females walked on a treadmill at 1.34 m/s. GMAX and GMED thickness, hip tri-planar kinematics, kinetics, and GMED sEMG were simultaneously recorded. USI-derived thickness measures were compared to other biomechanical outcomes using cross-correlation analyses, computed at each 1% (11-ms) of the gait cycle with lag times from -20% to 20%. GMED and GMAX thickness measures were most strongly correlated with hip extension and abduction angles at 150-220-ms lags (cross-correlation coefficients [CCF]: -0.34; -0.83). GMED thickness was most correlated to abduction and external rotation moments simultaneously (CCF: -0.28; -0.47). GMAX thickness and flexion moments were most strongly correlated at a 66-ms lag (CCF: 0.33). GMED sEMG amplitude was most strongly correlated to muscle thickness at a 99-ms lag (CCF: 0.39). These results elucidate the unique information provided from USI-derived measures of gluteal muscle thickness during walking.

摘要

超声成像(USI)对肌肉厚度的测量提供了不同于运动学、动力学和表面肌电图(sEMG)的肌肉骨骼功能见解,然而,目前尚不清楚 USI 衍生的测量值与行走过程中的传统测量值如何相关。本研究的目的是比较 USI 衍生的臀大肌(GMAX)和臀中肌(GMED)厚度测量值与髋关节三平面运动学和动力学,以及 GMED 厚度与 sEMG 幅度的关系。14 名女性以 1.34 m/s 的速度在跑步机上行走。同时记录 GMAX 和 GMED 厚度、髋关节三平面运动学、动力学和 GMED sEMG。使用交叉相关分析将 USI 衍生的厚度测量值与其他生物力学结果进行比较,在步态周期的每个 1%(11 毫秒)进行计算,并在-20%至 20%的滞后时间进行计算。GMED 和 GMAX 厚度测量值与髋关节伸展和外展角度在 150-220 毫秒滞后时间具有最强的相关性(交叉相关系数 [CCF]:-0.34;-0.83)。GMED 厚度与外展和外旋力矩的相关性最强(CCF:-0.28;-0.47)。GMAX 厚度和屈曲力矩在 66 毫秒滞后时间具有最强的相关性(CCF:0.33)。GMED sEMG 幅度与肌肉厚度在 99 毫秒滞后时间具有最强的相关性(CCF:0.39)。这些结果阐明了在行走过程中 USI 衍生的臀肌厚度测量值提供的独特信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验