University of Virginia Exercise and Sports Injury Lab, 210 Emmet Street South, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4407, USA.
Texas State University Biomechanics/Sports Medicine Lab, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666-4616, USA.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2020 Apr;51:102406. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102406. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
Ultrasound imaging (USI) of muscle thickness offers different insights into musculoskeletal function than kinematics, kinetics, and surface electromyography (sEMG), however it is unknown how USI-derived measures correlate to traditional measures during walking. The purpose of this study was to compare USI-derived gluteus maximus (GMAX) and medius (GMED) thickness measures to tri-planar hip kinematics and kinetics, and GMED thickness to sEMG amplitude. Fourteen females walked on a treadmill at 1.34 m/s. GMAX and GMED thickness, hip tri-planar kinematics, kinetics, and GMED sEMG were simultaneously recorded. USI-derived thickness measures were compared to other biomechanical outcomes using cross-correlation analyses, computed at each 1% (11-ms) of the gait cycle with lag times from -20% to 20%. GMED and GMAX thickness measures were most strongly correlated with hip extension and abduction angles at 150-220-ms lags (cross-correlation coefficients [CCF]: -0.34; -0.83). GMED thickness was most correlated to abduction and external rotation moments simultaneously (CCF: -0.28; -0.47). GMAX thickness and flexion moments were most strongly correlated at a 66-ms lag (CCF: 0.33). GMED sEMG amplitude was most strongly correlated to muscle thickness at a 99-ms lag (CCF: 0.39). These results elucidate the unique information provided from USI-derived measures of gluteal muscle thickness during walking.
超声成像(USI)对肌肉厚度的测量提供了不同于运动学、动力学和表面肌电图(sEMG)的肌肉骨骼功能见解,然而,目前尚不清楚 USI 衍生的测量值与行走过程中的传统测量值如何相关。本研究的目的是比较 USI 衍生的臀大肌(GMAX)和臀中肌(GMED)厚度测量值与髋关节三平面运动学和动力学,以及 GMED 厚度与 sEMG 幅度的关系。14 名女性以 1.34 m/s 的速度在跑步机上行走。同时记录 GMAX 和 GMED 厚度、髋关节三平面运动学、动力学和 GMED sEMG。使用交叉相关分析将 USI 衍生的厚度测量值与其他生物力学结果进行比较,在步态周期的每个 1%(11 毫秒)进行计算,并在-20%至 20%的滞后时间进行计算。GMED 和 GMAX 厚度测量值与髋关节伸展和外展角度在 150-220 毫秒滞后时间具有最强的相关性(交叉相关系数 [CCF]:-0.34;-0.83)。GMED 厚度与外展和外旋力矩的相关性最强(CCF:-0.28;-0.47)。GMAX 厚度和屈曲力矩在 66 毫秒滞后时间具有最强的相关性(CCF:0.33)。GMED sEMG 幅度与肌肉厚度在 99 毫秒滞后时间具有最强的相关性(CCF:0.39)。这些结果阐明了在行走过程中 USI 衍生的臀肌厚度测量值提供的独特信息。