• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助 DIEP 皮瓣采集用于自体乳房重建:尸体模型上的比较可行性研究。

Robotic-Assisted DIEP Flap Harvest for Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Feasibility Study on a Cadaveric Model.

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 Jun;36(5):362-368. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701666. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1701666
PMID:32106313
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the most common perforator flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction. Contrary to the conventional open approach, robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest intends to preserve ARS integrity, thereby reducing the morbidity. We assessed the feasibility and compared performance outcomes of a robotic, cadaveric training model for DIEP flap harvest using two approaches: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP).

METHODS

A robotics system (da Vinci Xi) was applied in conjunction with a cadaveric training model. Ports were placed in the abdominal wall to triangulate each DIEP flap. Surgical time and technical characteristics were recorded. Values were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Eight female cadavers (16 hemi-DIEP flaps) were dissected: 50% TAPP and 50% TEP approaches. Mean harvest time was 56 minutes (range: 48-74 minutes) and 65 minutes (range: 60-83 minutes) for TAPP versus TEP groups, respectively ( < 0.05). Mean pedicle dissection time was 36 minutes (range: 25-40 minutes) and 39 minutes (range: 30-42 minutes) for TAPP versus TEP groups, respectively ( > 0.05). Intra-abdominal contents were manipulated twice on average in the TAPP group versus 0 times in the TEP group ( < 0.05). One TAPP case had an injury to the bowel, and one TEP case was converted to conventional open due to pneumoperitoneum.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest represents a technological enhancement for advanced regenerative plastic surgery. Our model demonstrated both TAPP and TEP are feasible, with TEP less invasive, preserving the posterior rectus sheath, and decreasing complication risks. However, there is a steeper and longer learning curve for TEP.

摘要

背景

深下腹壁穿支皮瓣(DIEP)是显微乳房重建中最常用的穿支皮瓣。与传统的开放式方法相反,机器人辅助 DIEP 皮瓣采集旨在保留 ARS 完整性,从而降低发病率。我们评估了使用两种方法(经腹前腹膜前(TAPP)和完全腹膜外(TEP))进行机器人辅助 DIEP 皮瓣采集的可行性,并比较了性能结果。

方法

使用机器人系统(达芬奇 Xi)结合尸体训练模型进行操作。在腹壁上放置端口以三角化每个 DIEP 皮瓣。记录手术时间和技术特点。分析并比较了数值。

结果

解剖了 8 具女性尸体(16 个半 DIEP 皮瓣):50% TAPP 和 50% TEP 方法。TAPP 组的平均采集时间为 56 分钟(范围:48-74 分钟),TEP 组为 65 分钟(范围:60-83 分钟)(<0.05)。TAPP 组的蒂部解剖时间平均为 36 分钟(范围:25-40 分钟),TEP 组为 39 分钟(范围:30-42 分钟)(>0.05)。TAPP 组平均两次操作腹腔内脏器,而 TEP 组为 0 次(<0.05)。TAPP 组有 1 例肠损伤,1 例 TEP 组因气腹转为传统开放式。

结论

机器人辅助 DIEP 皮瓣采集代表了先进再生整形外科的技术增强。我们的模型表明 TAPP 和 TEP 都是可行的,TEP 具有侵入性较小、保留后腹直肌鞘、降低并发症风险的优点。然而,TEP 的学习曲线更陡峭、更长。

相似文献

1
Robotic-Assisted DIEP Flap Harvest for Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Feasibility Study on a Cadaveric Model.机器人辅助 DIEP 皮瓣采集用于自体乳房重建:尸体模型上的比较可行性研究。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 Jun;36(5):362-368. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701666. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
2
Robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest in breast reconstruction.机器人辅助下腹深上动脉穿支皮瓣在乳房重建中的应用。
Microsurgery. 2022 May;42(4):319-325. doi: 10.1002/micr.30856. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
3
[Robotic-Assisted DIEP Flap Harvest for Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Case Report, Technical Aspects and Identification of Suitable Patients].[机器人辅助腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣切取用于自体乳房重建:病例报告、技术要点及合适患者的识别]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2024 Apr;56(2):147-155. doi: 10.1055/a-2239-6513. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
4
Robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap abdominal harvest for breast reconstruction: A case report.机器人辅助下腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术:一例报告
Microsurgery. 2018 Sep;38(6):702-705. doi: 10.1002/micr.30297. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
5
Literature Review: Robotic-Assisted Harvest of Deep Inferior Epigastric Flap for Breast Reconstruction.文献综述:用于乳房重建的腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣的机器人辅助采集
Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Dec 1;89(6):703-708. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003326.
6
Laparoscopy allows the harvest of the DIEP flap with shorter fascial incisions as compared to endoscopic harvest: A single surgeon retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜与内镜采集相比,可通过更短的筋膜切口采集 DIEP 皮瓣:单外科医生回顾性队列研究。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Jun;74(6):1203-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.098. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
7
Robotic DIEP Flap Harvest through a Totally Extraperitoneal Approach Using a Single-Port Surgical Robotic System.经全腹腔外途径应用单孔手术机器人系统行机器人游离腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣移植术
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Aug 1;148(2):304-307. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008181.
8
Minimally Invasive Laparoscopically Dissected Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap: An Anatomical Feasibility Study and a First Clinical Case.微创腹腔镜下解剖的腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣:解剖可行性研究及首例临床病例
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan;141(1):33-39. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003989.
9
Implementing the Robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator Flap in daily practice: A series of 10 cases.在日常实践中实施机器人深下腹直肌穿支皮瓣:10 例系列。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Aug;75(8):2577-2583. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.02.054. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
10
Optimizing Efficiency in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.优化腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建的效率
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;75(2):186-92. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000559.

引用本文的文献

1
The emerging role of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人技术在整形和重建外科中的新兴作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 15;18(1):254. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01987-7.
2
Surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional autologous breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与传统自体乳房重建术的手术结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 May 2;18(1):189. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01913-x.
3
Robotics in Implant-Based and Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
基于植入物和自体组织的乳房重建中的机器人技术
Semin Plast Surg. 2023 Aug 3;37(3):168-175. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771235. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Robotic Microsurgery in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Literature Review.机器人显微外科在整形与重建外科中的应用:文献回顾。
Surg Innov. 2023 Oct;30(5):607-614. doi: 10.1177/15533506231191211. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
5
Clinical outcomes following robotic versus conventional DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: A retrospective matched study.机器人辅助与传统腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术后的临床结局:一项回顾性匹配研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 14;12:989231. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.989231. eCollection 2022.
6
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Breast Surgery: Recent Evidence with Comparative Clinical Outcomes.机器人辅助微创乳腺手术:具有比较临床结果的最新证据
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 25;11(7):1827. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071827.
7
Robotic DIEP Patient Selection: Analysis of CT Angiography.腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣手术机器人辅助患者选择:CT血管造影分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Dec 7;9(12):e3970. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003970. eCollection 2021 Dec.