Suppr超能文献

经小切口剖腹术和腹腔镜在人工流产术后病例中应用输卵管环的对比研究。

A comparative study of the tubal ring applied via minilaparotomy and laparoscopy in postabortion cases.

作者信息

Bhatt R V, Pachauri S, Pathak N D, John E

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1978;16(2):162-6. doi: 10.1002/j.1879-3479.1978.tb00418.x.

Abstract

Sterilization with tubal rings applied via minilaparotomy or laparoscopy was performed on 300 randomly selected postabortion subjects to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the two surgical methods. One hundred and forty-nine procedures were performed by minilaparotomy and 151 by laparoscopy. Gas leakage due to equipment problems was the most common technical difficulty during laparoscopy, and difficulty in exteriorizing the tubes was the most common surgical difficulty. Women undergoing laparoscopy experienced significantly less pain during surgery and had significantly lower rates of immediate and early postoperative complications than those women undergoing minilaparotomy. The rates of gynecologic abnormalities at six and 12 months were similar for both procedures. At this writing, no pregnancies have been reported among the study subjects. The results of our study indicate that laparoscopy is superior to minilaparotomy when it is performed in a controlled hospital situation.

摘要

对300名随机选取的流产后女性通过小切口剖腹术或腹腔镜检查应用输卵管环进行绝育,以评估这两种手术方法的安全性和有效性。149例手术通过小切口剖腹术进行,151例通过腹腔镜检查进行。腹腔镜检查期间,因设备问题导致的气体泄漏是最常见的技术难题,而输卵管外置困难是最常见的手术难题。接受腹腔镜检查的女性在手术期间经历的疼痛明显较少,术后即刻和早期并发症的发生率也明显低于接受小切口剖腹术的女性。两种手术在6个月和12个月时的妇科异常发生率相似。在撰写本文时,研究对象中未报告有妊娠情况。我们的研究结果表明,在可控的医院环境中进行手术时,腹腔镜检查优于小切口剖腹术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验