Song Ethan Y, Frakes Jessica M, Extermann Martine, Klocksieben Farina, Mehta Rutika, Saeed Sabrina, Hoffe Sarah E, Pimiento Jose M
University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
J Surg Res. 2020 Jul;251:100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
The incidence of esophageal cancer is increasing in the United States. Although neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for locally advanced cancers followed by surgical resection is the standard of care, there are no clearly defined guidelines for patients aged ≥79 y.
Query of an institutional review board-approved database of 1031 esophagectomies at our institution revealed 35 patients aged ≥79 y from 1999 to 2017 who underwent esophagectomy. Age, gender, tumor location, histology, clinical stage, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), NAT administration, pathologic response rate to NAT, surgery type, negative margin resection status, postoperative complications, postoperative death, length of stay, 30- and 90-d mortality, and disease status parameters were analyzed in association with clinical outcome.
The median age of the octogenarian cohort was 82.1 y with a male preponderance (91.4%). American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging was stage I for 20% of patients, stage II for 27% of patients, and stage III for 50% of patients, which was not statistically significant compared with the younger cohort (P = 0.576). Within the octogenarian group, 54% received NAT compared with 67% in the younger group (P = 0.098). There was no difference in postoperative complications (P = 0.424), postoperative death (P = 0.312), and recurrence rate (P = 0.434) between the groups. However, CCI was significantly different between the octogenarian and nonoctogenarian cohort (P = 0.008), and octogenarians had shorter overall survival (18 versus 62 mo, P<0.001). None of the other parameters assessed were associated with clinical outcomes.
Curative surgery is viable and safe for octogenarians with esophageal cancer. Long-term survival was significantly shorter in the octogenarian group, suggesting the need for better clinical selection criteria for esophagectomy after chemoradiation and that identification of complete responders for nonoperative management is warranted.
在美国,食管癌的发病率正在上升。尽管对于局部晚期癌症先进行新辅助治疗(NAT)然后进行手术切除是标准的治疗方法,但对于年龄≥79岁的患者尚无明确的指南。
查询我院机构审查委员会批准的1031例食管切除术数据库,发现1999年至2017年间有35例年龄≥79岁的患者接受了食管切除术。分析年龄、性别、肿瘤位置、组织学、临床分期、查尔森合并症指数(CCI)、NAT的应用、NAT的病理反应率、手术类型、切缘阴性切除状态、术后并发症、术后死亡、住院时间、30天和90天死亡率以及疾病状态参数与临床结局的关系。
八旬老人队列的中位年龄为82.1岁,男性占优势(91.4%)。美国癌症联合委员会临床分期中,20%的患者为I期,27%的患者为II期,50%的患者为III期,与年轻队列相比无统计学差异(P = 0.576)。在八旬老人组中,54%接受了NAT,而年轻组为67%(P = 0.098)。两组之间术后并发症(P = 0.424)、术后死亡(P = 0.312)和复发率(P = 0.434)无差异。然而,八旬老人和非八旬老人队列之间的CCI有显著差异(P = 0.008),八旬老人的总生存期较短(18个月对62个月,P<0.001)。评估的其他参数均与临床结局无关。
对于患有食管癌的八旬老人,根治性手术是可行且安全的。八旬老人组的长期生存率明显较短,这表明需要更好的放化疗后食管切除术临床选择标准,并且有必要识别出适合非手术治疗的完全缓解者。