From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging (A.Y.I., A.A., M.M.S., P.M.)
Department of Clinical Sciences (A.Y.I.), Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Mar;41(3):535-541. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6441. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
Conventional angiography is the criterion standard for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. We evaluated signal intensity ratios from TOF-MRA as a measure of intracranial stenosis and infarct risk in pediatric stroke.
A retrospective study was undertaken in children with intracranial arterial stenosis, who had TOF-MRA and conventional angiography performed within 6 months. Arterial diameters were measured for percentage stenosis. ROI analysis on TOF-MRA measured signal intensity in pre- and poststenotic segments, with post-/pre-signal intensity ratios calculated. The Pearson correlation was used to compare percentage stenosis on MRA with conventional angiography and signal intensity ratios with percentage stenosis; the point-biserial correlation was used for infarcts compared with percentage stenosis and signal intensity ratios. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for determining severe (≥70%) stenosis from MRA and signal intensity ratios against the criterion standard conventional angiography. < .05 was considered statistically significant.
Seventy stenotic segments were found in 48 studies in 41 children (median age, 11.0 years; range, 5 months to 17.0 years; male/female ratio, 22:19): 20/41 (48.8%) bilateral, 11/41 (26.8%) right, and 10/41 (24.4%) left, with the most common site being the proximal middle cerebral artery (22/70, 31%). Moyamoya disease accounted for 27/41 (65.9%). Signal intensity ratios and conventional angiography stenosis showed a moderate negative correlation ( = -0.54, < .001). Receiver operating characteristic statistics showed an area under the curve of 0.86 for using post-/pre-signal intensity ratios to determine severe (≥70%) carotid stenosis, yielding a threshold of 1.00. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for severe stenosis were the following-MRA: 42.8%, 58.8%, 30.0%, and 71.4%; signal intensity ratio >1.00: 97.1%, 77.8%, 71.7%, and 97.4%; combination: 75.5%, 100%, 100%, and 76.8%, respectively. Signal intensity ratios decreased with increasing grade of stenosis (none/mild-moderate/severe/complete, < .001) and were less when associated with infarcts (0.81 ± 0.52 for arteries associated with downstream infarcts versus 1.31 ± 0.55 for arteries without associated infarcts, < .001).
Signal intensity ratios from TOF-MRA can serve as a noninvasive measure of intracranial arterial stenosis and allow identification of high-risk lesions in pediatric stroke.
传统血管造影术是测量颅内动脉狭窄的标准。我们评估了 TOF-MRA 的信号强度比作为儿童卒中颅内狭窄和梗死风险的指标。
对颅内动脉狭窄的儿童进行回顾性研究,这些儿童在 6 个月内进行了 TOF-MRA 和传统血管造影检查。测量动脉直径以计算狭窄百分比。TOF-MRA 上的 ROI 分析测量狭窄前和狭窄后的信号强度,并计算出后/前信号强度比。采用 Pearson 相关分析比较 MRA 与传统血管造影的狭窄百分比和信号强度比与狭窄百分比之间的相关性;采用点双变量相关分析比较梗死与狭窄百分比和信号强度比之间的相关性。为了从 MRA 和信号强度比确定严重(≥70%)狭窄,计算了针对标准的传统血管造影术的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。<.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
在 41 名儿童的 48 项研究中发现了 70 个狭窄部位(中位数年龄 11.0 岁;范围 5 个月至 17.0 岁;男/女比例 22:19):20/41(48.8%)为双侧,11/41(26.8%)为右侧,10/41(24.4%)为左侧,最常见的部位是大脑中动脉近端(22/70,31%)。烟雾病占 27/41(65.9%)。信号强度比和传统血管造影术狭窄呈中度负相关(= -0.54,<.001)。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,使用后/前信号强度比来确定严重(≥70%)颈动脉狭窄的曲线下面积为 0.86,得出阈值为 1.00。严重狭窄的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值如下-MRA:42.8%、58.8%、30.0%和 71.4%;信号强度比>1.00:97.1%、77.8%、71.7%和 97.4%;联合:75.5%、100%、100%和 76.8%。信号强度比随狭窄程度的增加而降低(无/轻度-中度/重度/完全,<.001),与梗死相关时降低(与下游梗死相关的动脉为 0.81±0.52,与无相关的动脉为 1.31±0.55,<.001)。
TOF-MRA 的信号强度比可以作为颅内动脉狭窄的无创测量指标,并可识别儿童卒中的高危病变。