Abraham Juneman
Psychology Department, Faculty of Humanities, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia.
F1000Res. 2019 Feb 28;8:237. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.18283.3. eCollection 2019.
National culture has been overlooked in discussions related to research productivity and impact owing to individual, socio-political structure, and economic factors. This study shows the relationships between the dimensions of cultural value orientation of the nation and research performance indicators. More than 60 countries were included and Pearson correlation analysis was employed. The variables were taken from Geert Hofstede and Scimago Journal & Country Rank worksheets. This study found that (1) Individualism has significant correlations with the majority of the indicators; (2) Power distance and indulgence correlate with a country's research impact in the form of citation per document; (3) Masculinity, long term orientation, and uncertainty avoidance do not correlate with the indicators. Owing to the fact that the national culture is relatively enduring, countries need to measure their elasticity of hopes and action plans in an effort to boost research productivity and impact, by integrating the national culture in the estimate.
由于个人、社会政治结构和经济因素,在有关研究生产力和影响力的讨论中,国家文化一直被忽视。本研究揭示了国家文化价值取向维度与研究绩效指标之间的关系。研究纳入了60多个国家,并采用了皮尔逊相关分析。变量取自吉尔特·霍夫斯泰德(Geert Hofstede)和Scimago期刊与国家排名工作表。本研究发现:(1)个人主义与大多数指标存在显著相关性;(2)权力距离和放纵与以每篇文献引用量形式体现的国家研究影响力相关;(3)男性气质、长期取向和不确定性规避与这些指标无关。鉴于国家文化相对持久,各国需要衡量其希望和行动计划的灵活性,以便通过在评估中纳入国家文化来提高研究生产力和影响力。