• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降低胃肠病学试验中统计学显著性的阈值。

Lowering the threshold of statistical significance in gastroenterology trials.

作者信息

Walters Corbin, Meyer Chase, Fladie Ian, Wayant Cole, Vassar Matt

机构信息

Department of Institutional Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, 1111 West 17th Street, Tulsa, OK, 74107, USA.

出版信息

Indian J Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb;39(1):92-96. doi: 10.1007/s12664-019-01007-9. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1007/s12664-019-01007-9
PMID:32130654
Abstract

A multidisciplinary international cohort of 72 expert statisticians and researchers recently proposed lowering the p value threshold from 0.05 to 0.005 to mitigate distortion of trial results and decrease bias. We hereby explored how a change to the p value threshold may alter the statistical significance of primary endpoints in gastroenterology (GE) randomized control trials (RCTs). We analyzed RCTs published in the 20 highest ranked GE and medicine journals. For each trial, we extracted the p values for the corresponding primary endpoints. We retrieved 233 RCTs, of which 159 were included in the final analysis yielding 202 primary endpoints. Of these endpoints, 60% had a p value less than 0.05 and when a threshold of less than 0.005 was applied, approximately 50% retained significance. We endorse a lower p value threshold as an actionable, provisional measure for improving statistical inference in GE RCTs until more long-term solutions become available.

摘要

一个由72位专家统计学家和研究人员组成的多学科国际团队最近提议将p值阈值从0.05降至0.005,以减轻试验结果的扭曲并减少偏差。我们在此探讨了p值阈值的变化如何改变胃肠病学(GE)随机对照试验(RCT)中主要终点的统计学显著性。我们分析了发表在排名前20的GE和医学期刊上的RCT。对于每项试验,我们提取了相应主要终点的p值。我们检索到233项RCT,其中159项纳入最终分析,产生了202个主要终点。在这些终点中,60%的p值小于0.05,当应用小于0.005的阈值时,约50%仍具有显著性。我们支持较低的p值阈值,作为在GE RCT中改善统计推断的一项可操作的临时措施,直到有更多长期解决方案可用。

相似文献

1
Lowering the threshold of statistical significance in gastroenterology trials.降低胃肠病学试验中统计学显著性的阈值。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb;39(1):92-96. doi: 10.1007/s12664-019-01007-9. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
2
Effects of a proposal to alter the statistical significance threshold on previously published orthopaedic trauma randomized controlled trials.改变统计学显著性阈值对先前发表的骨科创伤随机对照试验的影响。
Injury. 2019 Nov;50(11):1934-1937. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
3
The Potential Effect of Lowering the Threshold of Statistical Significance From P < .05 to P < .005 in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine.将统计学显著性阈值从 P <.05 降低至 P <.005 在矫形运动医学中的潜在影响。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Apr;37(4):1068-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.041. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
4
Lowering the statistical significance threshold of randomized controlled trials in three major general anesthesiology journals.降低三大普通麻醉学期刊随机对照试验的统计学显著性阈值。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Sep;70(9):1441-1448. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02529-9. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
5
Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials of gastroenterology and hepatology.胃肠病学和肝病学随机对照试验中注册的主要结局与发表的主要结局的比较。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec;48(12):1474-83. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.845909. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
6
Reinterpretation of the results of randomized clinical trials.随机临床试验结果的再解读。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 14;19(6):e0305575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305575. eCollection 2024.
7
Potential effects of lowering the threshold of statistical significance in the field of chronic rhinosinusitis - A meta-research on published randomized controlled trials over last decade.降低慢性鼻-鼻窦炎研究领域统计学显著性阈值的潜在影响——对过去十年发表的随机对照试验的元研究。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S83-S89. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.004. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
8
Minimum false-positive risk of primary outcomes and impact of reducing nominal P-value threshold from 0.05 to 0.005 in anaesthesiology randomised clinical trials: a cross-sectional study.麻醉学随机临床试验中主要结局的最低假阳性风险以及将名义P值阈值从0.05降低到0.005的影响:一项横断面研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;130(4):412-420. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
9
Methodological reporting of randomized clinical trials in major gastroenterology and hepatology journals in 2006.2006年主要胃肠病学和肝病学期刊中随机临床试验的方法学报告
Hepatology. 2009 Jun;49(6):2108-12. doi: 10.1002/hep.22861.
10
Primary endpoint discrepancies were found in one in ten clinical drug trials. Results of an inception cohort study.在十分之一的临床药物试验中发现了主要终点差异。一项起始队列研究的结果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;89:199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 20.