Clarke John-Ross D, Duarte Lau Freddy, Zarich Stuart W
Department of Internal Medicine, Yale-New Haven Health/Bridgeport Hospital, Bridgeport, CT 06610, USA.
The Heart and Vascular Institute, Yale-New Haven Health/Bridgeport Hospital, Bridgeport, CT 06610, USA.
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 2;9(3):665. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030665.
The evaluation of coronary lesions has evolved in recent years. Physiologic-guided revascularization (particularly with pressure-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR)) has led to superior outcomes compared to traditional angiographic assessment. A greater importance, therefore, has been placed on the functional significance of an epicardial lesion. Despite the improvements in the limitations of angiography, insights into the relationship between hemodynamic significance and plaque morphology at the lesion level has shown that determining the implications of epicardial lesions is rather complex. Investigators have sought greater understanding by correlating ischemia quantified by FFR with plaque characteristics determined on invasive and non-invasive modalities. We review the background of the use of these diagnostic tools in coronary artery disease and discuss the implications of analyzing physiological stenosis severity and plaque characteristics concurrently.
近年来,冠状动脉病变的评估方法不断发展。与传统血管造影评估相比,生理指标指导下的血运重建(尤其是基于压力的血流储备分数(FFR))已带来更好的治疗效果。因此,心外膜病变的功能意义受到了更大的重视。尽管血管造影的局限性有所改善,但对病变水平血流动力学意义与斑块形态之间关系的深入研究表明,确定心外膜病变的影响相当复杂。研究人员试图通过将FFR量化的缺血与通过有创和无创方式确定的斑块特征相关联,以加深理解。我们回顾了这些诊断工具在冠状动脉疾病中应用的背景,并讨论了同时分析生理狭窄严重程度和斑块特征的意义。