Suppr超能文献

扫描策略和扫描仪类型对口腔内扫描准确性的影响:评估扫描数据准确性的新方法。

Effects of Scanning Strategy and Scanner Type on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: A New Approach for Assessing the Accuracy of Scanned Data.

机构信息

Clinical assistant professor, Department of Prosthodontic, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Associate professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2020 Jul;29(6):518-523. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13158. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the most reliable scanning strategy and scanner type, using a new protocol for assessing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of intraoral scan data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five different maxillary and mandibular typodont pairs (n = 10) and 2 intraoral scanners were used for the study. A reference scan for each arch was obtained with an industrial scanner. Scanning strategies were classified into 2 continuous methods-continuous scan in horizontal direction (CH group) and continuous scan with vertical rotation in anterior region (CV group)-and 1 segmental method (S group). In the CH group, the scanner head was maintained mostly in a horizontal position. In the CV group, the scanners were rotated 180° around the anterior tooth region to allow smooth scanning through the area. The intraoral scan data were individually superimposed over their corresponding reference scan data. Raw data of the distances between paired surface points were extracted from the superimposed pairs of datasets, with (original distance values) or without consideration (absolute distance values) of the value signs. Trueness values were calculated using absolute distance values, while precision values were obtained from original distance values. Data were analyzed with a 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance using α = 0.05 as the level of significance.

RESULTS

The CV group produced significantly inferior outcomes compared to the CH and S groups in terms of trueness (p < 0.001, F = 24.67), whereas no significant differences were observed among the 3 scanning strategies with respect to precision (p = 0.451, F = 0.83). Scanner type did not produce significant differences in terms of either trueness (p = 0.058, F = 4.72) or precision (p = 0.742, F = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

The segmental approach for scanning the region of interest first and continuous scanning with the scanner head held mostly in a horizontal position are both acceptable as full-arch scanning strategies. However, vertical rotation of intraoral scanners should be minimized.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用新的评估方案来确定最可靠的扫描策略和扫描仪类型,以评估口内扫描数据的准确性(准确性和精密度)。

材料与方法

本研究使用了 5 对不同的上颌和下颌模型(n=10)和 2 种口内扫描仪。每个弓均采用工业扫描仪获得参考扫描。扫描策略分为 2 种连续方法——水平方向连续扫描(CH 组)和前牙区垂直旋转连续扫描(CV 组)——和 1 种分段方法(S 组)。在 CH 组中,扫描仪头基本保持在水平位置。在 CV 组中,扫描仪绕前牙区域旋转 180°,以实现区域内的顺畅扫描。将口内扫描数据分别与相应的参考扫描数据叠加。从叠加的数据集对中提取配对表面点之间的原始数据距离,并考虑(绝对值)或不考虑(绝对值)数值符号。使用绝对值计算准确性值,而原始距离值用于获取精密度值。使用α=0.05 作为显著性水平,采用 2 因素重复测量方差分析对数据进行分析。

结果

与 CH 组和 S 组相比,CV 组在准确性方面的结果明显较差(p<0.001,F=24.67),而在精密度方面,3 种扫描策略之间没有显著差异(p=0.451,F=0.83)。扫描仪类型在准确性(p=0.058,F=4.72)或精密度(p=0.742,F=0.12)方面均无显著差异。

结论

分段法先扫描感兴趣区域,然后以扫描仪头基本保持水平的方式进行连续扫描,这两种方法都可作为全牙弓扫描策略。但是,应尽量减少口内扫描仪的垂直旋转。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验