• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进行直接喉镜检查时,围手术期持续抗栓治疗是否安全?

Is Continued Perioperative Antithrombotic Therapy Safe When Performing Direct Microlaryngoscopy?

作者信息

Saba Elias S, Higgins Michelle K, Heyes Richard, Lott David G

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, U.S.A.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130(12):2853-2858. doi: 10.1002/lary.28600. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1002/lary.28600
PMID:32134121
Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate whether antithrombotic status impacts the incidence of perioperative or postoperative bleeding in direct microlaryngoscopy (DML).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Patients undergoing DML in a single surgeon's practice from September 2012 to September 2017 were studied. Included patients underwent DML with or without biopsy, balloon dilation, microsurgery, laser ablation, or vocal fold injection. Patients were stratified based on perioperative antithrombotic status and assessed for rates of peri- and postoperative bleeding and other complications.

RESULTS

Of the 581 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 179 patients (31%) had a history of baseline antithrombotic therapy. Of these patients, 124 had perioperative continuation of their therapy. Medicated patients were older (P < .01), predominately male (P < .01), and increasingly comorbid (P < .01). Perioperative complications unrelated to bleeding occurred in 22 patients (4%), minor perioperative bleeding occurred in four patients (0.7%), and minor postoperative bleeding occurred in 12 of the 479 patients with recorded follow-up (2.5%). There were no postoperative bleeds requiring intervention or readmission, and no recorded thrombotic events during the peri- and postoperative period. There was no difference in perioperative bleeding based on baseline antithrombotic status (P = .81). Patients on baseline antithrombotic therapy were more likely to have a postoperative bleed in comparison to patients without history of antithrombotic use (P < .01). However, there were no significant differences in postoperative bleeding between patients on baseline anticoagulation who continued or ceased their medication perioperatively (P = .45).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative continuation of antithrombotic medications appears to be safe when performing routine DML.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 2020.

摘要

目的/假设:评估抗血栓状态是否会影响直接喉镜检查(DML)围手术期或术后出血的发生率。

研究设计

回顾性病历审查。

方法

对2012年9月至2017年9月在单一外科医生处接受DML的患者进行研究。纳入的患者接受了有或无活检、球囊扩张、显微手术、激光消融或声带注射的DML。根据围手术期抗血栓状态对患者进行分层,并评估围手术期和术后出血率及其他并发症。

结果

在符合纳入标准的581例患者中,179例(31%)有基线抗血栓治疗史。在这些患者中,124例在围手术期继续治疗。接受药物治疗的患者年龄较大(P < 0.01),以男性为主(P < 0.01),合并症越来越多(P < 0.01)。22例患者(4%)发生了与出血无关的围手术期并发症,4例患者(0.7%)发生了轻微围手术期出血,在479例有记录随访的患者中,12例(2.5%)发生了轻微术后出血。没有术后出血需要干预或再次入院,围手术期和术后期间也没有记录到血栓形成事件。根据基线抗血栓状态,围手术期出血没有差异(P = 0.81)。与没有抗血栓使用史的患者相比,接受基线抗血栓治疗的患者术后出血的可能性更大(P < 0.01)。然而,围手术期继续或停止用药的基线抗凝患者术后出血没有显著差异(P = 0.45)。

结论

在进行常规DML时,围手术期继续使用抗血栓药物似乎是安全的。

证据水平

4 喉镜,2020年。

相似文献

1
Is Continued Perioperative Antithrombotic Therapy Safe When Performing Direct Microlaryngoscopy?进行直接喉镜检查时,围手术期持续抗栓治疗是否安全?
Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130(12):2853-2858. doi: 10.1002/lary.28600. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
2
Are Perioperative Antibiotics Necessary During Direct Microlaryngoscopy?直接喉镜检查期间围手术期使用抗生素是否必要?
Laryngoscope. 2018 Dec;128(12):2838-2843. doi: 10.1002/lary.27308. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
3
Is Continued Perioperative Antithrombotic Therapy Safe When Performing Open Tracheostomy?行开放式气管切开术时继续围手术期抗栓治疗安全吗?
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023 Nov;132(11):1285-1292. doi: 10.1177/00034894221147807. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
4
Postoperative bleeding complications after gastric cancer surgery in patients receiving anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet agents.胃癌手术后接受抗凝和/或抗血小板药物治疗的患者的术后出血并发症。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Nov;19(12):3745-52. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2500-6. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
5
Assessing the safety of continued perioperative antithrombotic therapy in endoscopic airway surgery for laryngotracheal stenosis.评估喉气管狭窄内镜气道手术中继续围手术期抗血栓治疗的安全性。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 Jul-Aug;44(4):103857. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103857. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
6
Perioperative antithrombotic therapy does not increase the incidence of early postoperative thromboembolic complications and bleeding in kidney transplantation - a retrospective study.围手术期抗血栓治疗不会增加肾移植术后早期血栓栓塞并发症和出血的发生率 - 一项回顾性研究。
Transpl Int. 2019 Apr;32(4):418-430. doi: 10.1111/tri.13387. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
7
Responsible, Safe, and Effective Use of Antithrombotics and Anticoagulants in Patients Undergoing Interventional Techniques: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines.介入技术治疗患者中抗血栓和抗凝药物的合理、安全、有效应用:美国介入疼痛医师学会(ASIPP)指南。
Pain Physician. 2019 Jan;22(1S):S75-S128.
8
Impact of perioperative aspirin continuation on bleeding complications in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.围手术期继续使用阿司匹林对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术出血并发症的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2075-2083. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07604-6. Epub 2020 May 6.
9
Assessment of bleeding risk of interventional techniques: a best evidence synthesis of practice patterns and perioperative management of anticoagulant and antithrombotic therapy.介入技术出血风险评估:抗凝和抗血栓治疗的实践模式和围手术期管理的最佳证据综合。
Pain Physician. 2013 Apr;16(2 Suppl):SE261-318.
10
Should antithrombotic therapy be stopped in patients undergoing gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection?接受胃内镜黏膜下剥离术的患者是否应停用抗血栓治疗?
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1746-1753. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5167-4. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative Management of Oral Antithrombotics in Dentistry and Oral Surgery: Part 2.口腔颌面外科学中抗栓药物的围手术期管理:第 2 部分。
Anesth Prog. 2023 Mar 1;70(1):37-48. doi: 10.2344/anpr-70-01-06.