Suppr超能文献

输卵管因素不孕伴既往异位妊娠:祸不单行?对 2892 名女性的回顾性队列研究。

Tubal factor infertility with prior ectopic pregnancy: a double whammy? A retrospective cohort study of 2,892 women.

机构信息

Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital Affiliated to Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Medical Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2020 May;113(5):1032-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.036. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of a history of previous naturally conceived tubal ectopic pregnancy (TEP) on subsequent IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) pregnancy and perinatal outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Reproductive medicine center in a tertiary hospital.

PATIENT(S): A total of 2,892 women with tubal infertility undergoing the first fresh IVF/ICSI cycle.

INTERVENTION(S): Women were stratified into three groups according to the type of previous naturally conceived pregnancy: TEP, intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), and no pregnancy.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were analyzed for each cohort and stratified into the following categories based on female age: <30 years, 30-35 years, and ≥35 years.

RESULT(S): Of the 2,892 patients with tubal factor infertility, 511 (17.7%) women had a history of TEP, 1,044 (36.1%) had prior IUP, and 1,337 (46.2%) had never been pregnant. Couples with an initial TEP tended to be younger and had experienced a shorter duration of infertility. Across the whole cohort, the optimal live birth rate decreased in older age groups. Live birth rates stratified by maternal age (<30, 30-35, ≥35 years) did not differ between the TEP group (59.9%, 53.7%, 45.5%) and the IUP (62.0%, 53.8%, 40.6%) and no pregnancy group (56.7%, 54.4%, 45.6%). This did not change after adjusting for confounders such as age and years of infertility. Previous treatment of TEP with salpingectomy, salpingostomy, or medical treatment did not significantly affect subsequent fertility outcomes. The rates of preterm and low birth weight after TEP were also not significantly higher than in women with a previous IUP.

CONCLUSION(S): Fertility history, including previous TEP, does not influence the probability of live birth after IVF/ICSI in women with tubal factor infertility.

摘要

目的

研究既往自然受孕输卵管妊娠(TEP)史对后续体外受精/胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)妊娠和围产结局的影响。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

三级医院生殖医学中心。

患者

共 2892 例因输卵管不孕接受首次新鲜 IVF/ICSI 周期的妇女。

干预

根据既往自然受孕妊娠类型,将妇女分为三组:TEP、宫内妊娠(IUP)和无妊娠。

主要观察指标

分析每个队列的妊娠和新生儿结局,并根据女性年龄分为以下几类:<30 岁、30-35 岁和≥35 岁。

结果

在 2892 例因输卵管因素不孕的患者中,511 例(17.7%)有 TEP 史,1044 例(36.1%)有既往 IUP 史,1337 例(46.2%)从未怀孕。初次 TEP 的夫妇往往更年轻,不孕时间更短。在整个队列中,随着年龄的增长,活产率呈下降趋势。按产妇年龄(<30、30-35、≥35 岁)分层,TEP 组(59.9%、53.7%、45.5%)、IUP 组(62.0%、53.8%、40.6%)和无妊娠组(56.7%、54.4%、45.6%)的活产率无差异。调整年龄和不孕年限等混杂因素后,结果仍然如此。TEP 经输卵管切除术、输卵管造口术或药物治疗的既往治疗并未显著影响后续生育结局。TEP 后早产和低出生体重的发生率也不比 IUP 后高。

结论

既往病史,包括 TEP,并不影响因输卵管因素不孕行 IVF/ICSI 后的活产率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验