• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无症状直肠前突行同期修补术是否会降低经骶骨阴道固定术患者的手术失败风险?

Does concurrent posterior repair for an asymptomatic rectocele reduce the risk of surgical failure in patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy?

机构信息

Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk A81, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Oct;31(10):2075-2080. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04268-7. Epub 2020 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-020-04268-7
PMID:32146522
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if a concurrent posterior repair for an asymptomatic rectocele at the time of sacrocolpopexy reduces the incidence of surgical failure.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review with a cross-sectional follow-up survey of all patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy from 2004 to 2014. Demographic and operative data were collected from the medical record. For the cross-sectional portion, patients were contacted to obtain information on symptoms and retreatment after surgery. In this study, we included patients with an asymptomatic rectocele on examination, defined as Ap or Bp ≥ -1 on POP-Q without defecatory dysfunction, which was defined as constipation based on the Rome III criteria, dyschezia, excessive straining and/or splinting to have a bowel movement. The primary outcome was a composite score of subjective bulge symptoms or retreatment for prolapse.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-four patients met the inclusion criteria: 185 (53.8%) had a sacrocolpopexy only (SCP) and 159 (46.2%) had a concurrent posterior repair (SCP + PR). The composite failure rate was 10.2% (95% CI = 7.4-13.8%), with a 13.5% (25) failure rate in the SCP group compared with 6.3% (10) in the SCP + PR group (p = 0.03). On multivariable logistic regression, the adjusted odds of failure was 2.79 in the SCP compared with the SCP + PR group (CI 1.25-6.23; P = 0.01). The rates of de novo defecatory dysfunction following surgery were low (SCP = 5.6% vs. SCP + PR = 7.5%, p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with asymptomatic rectoceles, a concurrent posterior repair at the time of sacrocolpopexy reduces the odds of composite patient-centered failure without an increased rate of dyspareunia or de novo defecatory dysfunction.

摘要

目的

确定在骶骨阴道固定术时同时修复无症状直肠前突是否会降低手术失败的发生率。

方法

这是一项回顾性图表分析,并对 2004 年至 2014 年间接受骶骨阴道固定术的所有患者进行了横断面随访调查。从病历中收集人口统计学和手术数据。在横断面部分,联系患者以获取手术后症状和再治疗的信息。在本研究中,我们纳入了检查中无症状直肠前突的患者,定义为 POP-Q 上 Ap 或 Bp 值≥-1,且无排便功能障碍,排便功能障碍定义为根据罗马 III 标准的便秘、排便困难、过度用力和/或排便时支撑。主要结局是主观膨出症状或脱垂再治疗的综合评分。

结果

符合纳入标准的患者共 344 例:185 例(53.8%)仅行骶骨阴道固定术(SCP),159 例(46.2%)行同期后修补术(SCP+PR)。复合失败率为 10.2%(95%CI=7.4-13.8%),SCP 组的失败率为 13.5%(25 例),SCP+PR 组的失败率为 6.3%(10 例)(p=0.03)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,SCP 组的失败调整比值比为 2.79(95%CI 1.25-6.23;P=0.01)。术后新发排便功能障碍的发生率较低(SCP=5.6%比 SCP+PR=7.5%,p=0.55)。

结论

对于无症状直肠前突的患者,在骶骨阴道固定术时同时进行后修补术可降低患者为中心的复合失败的可能性,且不会增加性交疼痛或新发排便功能障碍的发生率。

相似文献

1
Does concurrent posterior repair for an asymptomatic rectocele reduce the risk of surgical failure in patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy?无症状直肠前突行同期修补术是否会降低经骶骨阴道固定术患者的手术失败风险?
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Oct;31(10):2075-2080. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04268-7. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
2
Predictors for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Recurrence After Sacrocolpopexy: A Matched Case-Control Study.经骶骨阴道固定术后盆腔器官脱垂复发的预测因素:一项配对病例对照研究。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):e165-e170. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000874.
3
Posterior Compartment Surgery Provides No Differential Benefit for Defecatory Symptoms Before or After Concomitant Mesh-Augmented Apical Suspension.在同时进行补片增强型顶端悬吊术之前或之后,后盆腔手术对排便症状无差异获益。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Mar/Apr;24(2):183-187. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000538.
4
Posterior compartment prolapse: a urogynecology perspective.后盆腔脱垂:泌尿妇科视角。
Urol Clin North Am. 2012 Aug;39(3):361-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2012.06.005.
5
Surgical interventions for posterior compartment prolapse and obstructed defecation symptoms: a systematic review with clinical practice recommendations.后盆腔脏器脱垂及排便障碍症状的外科干预:一项包含临床实践建议的系统评价
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Sep;30(9):1433-1454. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04001-z. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
6
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.女性盆腔器官脱垂的外科治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5.
7
RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.阴道腹膜外子宫骶韧带悬吊术(VEULS)联合前路补片与骶骨阴道固定术的随机对照试验:4年随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Nov;29(11):1607-1614. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3687-2. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
8
Surgical correction of the genital hiatus at the time of sacrocolpopexy - a 7-year Markov analysis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.经阴道骶骨固定术同期行会阴体修补术的手术矫正 - 7 年马尔可夫分析:成本效益分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Dec;34(12):2969-2975. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05628-9. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
9
Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse: Suture-Based Repair.阴道后壁脱垂:基于缝合的修复术
Urol Clin North Am. 2019 Feb;46(1):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.007.
10
Long-term pelvic organ prolapse recurrence and mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy.骶棘韧带固定术后长期盆腔器官脱垂复发及网片暴露情况
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Sep;31(9):1763-1770. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04291-8. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the Clinical Value of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy to Support the Posterior Compartment in Women with Multicompartment Prolapse Including Rectocele.腹腔镜骶棘韧带固定术对包括直肠膨出在内的多部位脱垂女性盆底后盆腔支持的临床价值分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 26;13(17):5051. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175051.
2
Robotic sacrocolpopexy.机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024 Mar;67(2):212-217. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23226. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
3
Surgical correction of the genital hiatus at the time of sacrocolpopexy - a 7-year Markov analysis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Restoring Genital Hiatus to Normative Values After Apical Suspension Alone Versus With Level 3 Support Procedures.单纯顶端悬吊术与联合三级支持手术恢复生殖裂孔至正常数值的比较
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 May/Jun;25(3):226-230. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000528.
2
Genital hiatus size is associated with and predictive of apical vaginal support loss.阴道口大小与阴道顶端支持组织丧失相关,并可预测其发生。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;214(6):718.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.027. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
3
Perineorrhaphy: commonly performed yet poorly understood. A survey of surgeons.
经阴道骶骨固定术同期行会阴体修补术的手术矫正 - 7 年马尔可夫分析:成本效益分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Dec;34(12):2969-2975. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05628-9. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
4
Is there an association between 6-month genital hiatus size and 24-month composite prolapse recurrence following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy?微创骶骨阴道固定术后6个月的阴道裂孔大小与24个月的综合脱垂复发之间是否存在关联?
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Oct;34(10):2593-2601. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05578-2. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
5
Importance of Translabial Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Its Correlation with the POP-Q Examination: Analysis of 363 Cases.经阴唇超声对盆腔器官脱垂诊断的重要性及其与盆腔器官脱垂定量分期系统(POP-Q)检查的相关性:363例病例分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 20;10(18):4267. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184267.
会阴修补术:虽常见但了解不足。一项针对外科医生的调查。
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Dec;26(12):1797-801. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2762-1. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
4
Prospective cohort study of bowel function after robotic sacrocolpopexy.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar-Apr;20(2):87-9. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000049.
5
Outlet constipation 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant posterior repair.
South Med J. 2013 Jul;106(7):409-14. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31829ba4ab.
6
Anatomic and functional outcomes of sacrocolpopexy with or without posterior colporrhaphy.伴或不伴后阴道壁修补术的骶骨阴道固定术的解剖学和功能结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Sep;23(9):1215-20. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1695-1. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
7
All Roads Lead to Rome: Update on Rome III Criteria and New Treatment Options.条条大路通罗马:罗马Ⅲ标准及新治疗方案的最新进展
Gastroenterol Rep. 2007 Winter;1(2):56-65.
8
Body image perceptions in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a qualitative study.盆腔器官脱垂女性的身体意象感知:一项定性研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;204(5):441.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.024. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
9
Sacrocolpopexy without concomitant posterior repair improves posterior compartment defects.不伴有后路修复的骶骨阴道固定术可改善后盆腔缺陷。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Sep;19(9):1267-70. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0628-5. Epub 2008 May 22.
10
Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study.腹骶阴道固定术或阴道骶棘韧带固定术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;190(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.031.