Knight Cardiovascular Institute Oregon Health & Science University Portland OR.
Cardiology Division Department of Medicine University of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester MA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Mar 17;9(6):e014108. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014108. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
Background Direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dosing guidelines for atrial fibrillation recommend dose alteration based on age, renal function, body weight, and drug-drug interactions. There is paucity of data describing the frequency and factors associated with prescription of potentially inappropriate doses. Methods and Results In the ongoing SAGE-AF (Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Elements in Atrial Fibrillation) study, we performed geriatric assessments (frailty, cognitive impairment, sensory impairments, social isolation, and depression) for participants with atrial fibrillation (age ≥65 years, CHADSVASc ≥2, no anticoagulant contraindications). We developed an algorithm to analyze DOAC dose appropriateness accounting for drug-drug interactions, age, renal function, and body weight. We also examined whether geriatric impairments were related to inappropriate dosing. Of 1064 patients prescribed anticoagulants, 460 received a DOAC. Participants were aged 74±7 years, 49% were women, and 82% were white. A quarter (23%; n=105) of participants received inappropriate DOAC dose, of whom 82 (78%) were underdosed and 23 (22%) were overdosed. Among participants receiving an inappropriate dose, 12 (11%) were identified using the drug-drug interactions criteria and would have otherwise been misclassified. In multivariable regression analyses, older age, higher CHADSVASc score, and history of renal failure were associated with inappropriate DOAC dosing (<0.05). Geriatric conditions were not associated with inappropriate dosing. Conclusions In this cohort, over 20% of older patients with atrial fibrillation treated with DOACs were prescribed an inappropriate dose, with most being underdosed. Drug-drug interactions were common. Factors that influence prescription of guideline-nonadherent doses may be perception of higher bleeding risk or presence of renal failure in addition to lack of familiarity with dosing guidelines.
直接口服抗凝药物(DOAC)用于治疗心房颤动的剂量指南建议根据年龄、肾功能、体重和药物相互作用来调整剂量。但是,有关描述潜在不适当剂量处方的频率和相关因素的数据却很少。
在正在进行的 SAGE-AF(心房颤动的老年元素系统评估)研究中,我们对患有心房颤动(年龄≥65 岁,CHADSVASc≥2,无抗凝剂禁忌证)的参与者进行了老年评估(虚弱、认知障碍、感觉障碍、社会隔离和抑郁)。我们开发了一种算法,用于分析考虑药物相互作用、年龄、肾功能和体重的 DOAC 剂量适宜性。我们还研究了老年障碍是否与不适当的剂量有关。在接受抗凝治疗的 1064 名患者中,有 460 名患者接受了 DOAC 治疗。参与者的年龄为 74±7 岁,49%为女性,82%为白人。四分之一(23%;n=105)的参与者接受了不适当的 DOAC 剂量,其中 82(78%)例剂量不足,23(22%)例剂量过大。在接受不适当剂量的参与者中,有 12 例(11%)是根据药物相互作用标准确定的,否则会被错误分类。在多变量回归分析中,年龄较大、较高的 CHADSVASc 评分和肾衰竭史与不适当的 DOAC 剂量有关(<0.05)。老年状况与不适当的剂量无关。
在该队列中,接受 DOAC 治疗的老年心房颤动患者中,超过 20%的患者处方剂量不适当,其中大多数剂量不足。药物相互作用很常见。影响处方指南非依从剂量的因素可能除了缺乏对剂量指南的熟悉外,还可能是对更高出血风险的认知或肾衰竭的存在。