Neurocritical Care Service, Harborview Medical Center.
Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2021 Oct 1;33(4):323-328. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000684.
Four editions of the Brain Trauma Foundation's (BTF) evidence-based guidelines have been published to guide clinical management after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and increase TBI research. We reviewed the association between published clinical severe TBI research and BTF guideline year of publication and guideline chapter topics. Using PubMed, we searched for peer-reviewed articles on severe TBI research published between 1975 and 2019. The frequency and study design of publications on chapter topics included in all 4 BTF guideline editions was collected and the relationship with published TBI research examined using linear regression and the coefficient of determination (r2). A total of 845 relevant articles were identified, with an average of 19 articles published per year. There was an increase in the overall number of publications (r2=0.72), with the largest increase occurring between the third and the fourth guideline editions (r2=0.70, 31 articles/y). Across all 4 guideline editions, 54% (n=460) of publications were retrospective studies, 27.2% (n=230) prospective studies, 12% (n=101) randomized controlled trials, and 7.6% (n=64) meta-analyses/systematic reviews. Publication of retrospective study numbers increased the most (r2=0.61), followed by prospective observational studies and meta-analyses/systematic reviews (r2=0.47 each), and randomized controlled trials (r2=0.39). The 3 most highly published guideline chapter topic areas were ventilator-associated pneumonia (r2=0.70), hyperosmolar therapy (r2=0.47), and decompressive craniectomy (r2=0.41). In summary, the TBI research output increased over time and was associated with BTF guideline release. However, the increase in published TBI research was not consistent between serial editions of the BTF guidelines, and many studies did not incorporate high-quality prospective research designs.
四版《脑创伤基金会(BTF)循证指南》已发布,旨在指导严重颅脑创伤(TBI)后的临床管理并促进 TBI 研究。我们回顾了发表的严重 TBI 研究与 BTF 指南发布年份和指南章节主题之间的关联。使用 PubMed,我们检索了 1975 年至 2019 年间发表的关于严重 TBI 研究的同行评议文章。收集了所有 4 版 BTF 指南中包含的章节主题相关出版物的频率和研究设计,并使用线性回归和确定系数(r2)检查其与发表的 TBI 研究之间的关系。共确定了 845 篇相关文章,平均每年发表 19 篇。总体出版物数量有所增加(r2=0.72),其中第三版和第四版指南之间的增幅最大(r2=0.70,每年增加 31 篇)。在所有 4 版指南中,54%(n=460)的出版物为回顾性研究,27.2%(n=230)为前瞻性研究,12%(n=101)为随机对照试验,7.6%(n=64)为荟萃分析/系统评价。回顾性研究数量的增加最为显著(r2=0.61),其次是前瞻性观察性研究和荟萃分析/系统评价(r2 分别为 0.47),随机对照试验(r2=0.39)。发表最多的 3 个指南章节主题领域是呼吸机相关性肺炎(r2=0.70)、高渗治疗(r2=0.47)和去骨瓣减压术(r2=0.41)。总之,TBI 研究产出随时间增加,并与 BTF 指南发布相关。然而,BTF 指南连续版本之间发表的 TBI 研究增加并不一致,许多研究并未纳入高质量的前瞻性研究设计。