Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Mar;34(2):319. doi: 10.1037/adb0000574.
Reports an error in "Evaluating the Combination of a Brief Motivational Intervention plus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression and heavy episodic drinking in college students" by Paola Pedrelli, Lauren B. Fisher, Maren Nyer, Benjamin G. Shapero, Amy Farabaugh, Emma R. Hayden, M. Taylor Levine, Maurizio Fava, Roger D. Weiss, Brian Borsari and Jennifer E. Merrill (, Advanced Online Publication, Dec 19, 2019, np). In the original article the order of authorship was incorrect. The correct second and third authors should appear instead as Brian Borsari and Jennifer E. Merrill. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2019-78454-001.) Heavy episodic drinking (HED) and depressive symptoms often co-occur among college students and are associated with significant impairment. However, evidence-based treatments for these common co-occurring conditions are not available for college students. The current study compared the effectiveness of a treatment combining Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Brief Motivational Interviewing (CBT-D + BMI) versus Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression (CBT-D) alone among 94 college students with HED and depressive symptoms. Both treatment programs were associated with significant reductions of similar magnitude in HED, alcohol-related problems (ARP), and depressive symptoms at the end of treatment and at the 1-month follow-up assessment. Moderation analyses indicated that, among college students with fewer depressive symptoms at baseline, CBT-D was associated with greater sustained reduction in heavy drinking relative to CBT-D + BMI at the 1-month follow-up. Although the study did not include a no-treatment condition, the magnitude of improvement during treatment in both groups was greater than what is expected with passage of time. Although clinicians in college counseling centers may lack specialty training for co-occurring conditions, CBT-D is widely implemented in college settings. Our findings suggest that CBT-D may reduce both depressive symptoms and HED in college students and may be used to address a significant public health problem. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
报告了 Paola Pedrelli、Lauren B. Fisher、Maren Nyer、Benjamin G. Shapero、Amy Farabaugh、Emma R. Hayden、M. Taylor Levine、Maurizio Fava、Roger D. Weiss、Brian Borsari 和 Jennifer E. Merrill 在“评估大学生抑郁和重度间歇性饮酒的简短动机干预加认知行为疗法的组合”中的错误（，高级在线出版物，2019 年 12 月 19 日，np）。在原始文章中，作者的顺序是不正确的。正确的第二和第三作者应该是 Brian Borsari 和 Jennifer E. Merrill。（原始文章的摘要如下）大学生中重度间歇性饮酒（HED）和抑郁症状经常同时发生，并且与严重的损害有关。然而，针对这些常见共病的循证治疗方法尚未应用于大学生。本研究比较了合并认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症和简短动机访谈（CBT-D + BMI）与单独认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症（CBT-D）对 94 名 HED 和抑郁症状的大学生的疗效。两种治疗方案在治疗结束时和 1 个月随访评估时，均使 HED、酒精相关问题（ARP）和抑郁症状显著降低，且降低幅度相似。调节分析表明，在基线时抑郁症状较少的大学生中，与 CBT-D + BMI 相比，CBT-D 在 1 个月随访时与持续减少重度饮酒有关。尽管该研究没有包括无治疗对照条件，但两组在治疗过程中的改善幅度大于随着时间的推移而预期的改善幅度。尽管大学咨询中心的临床医生可能缺乏共病的专业培训，但 CBT-D 在大学环境中得到广泛应用。我们的研究结果表明，CBT-D 可能会减少大学生的抑郁症状和 HED，并且可以用来解决一个重大的公共卫生问题。（PsycINFO 数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。
