Faculty of Natural Sciences, Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellońska 28, 40-032, Katowice, Poland.
Faculty of Natural Sciences, Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellońska 28, 40-032, Katowice, Poland.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020 May;194:110434. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110434. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
A factor that may significantly increase the efficacy of phytoextraction is soil bioaugmentation with specific bacteria, which can alter the composition of rhizospheric and endophytic bacterial communities. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of soil treatment with living (bioaugmentation) and dead (control) cells of the plant growth-promoting metal-resistant endophytic strain Pseudomonas sp. H15 on the bacterial community composition in the rhizo- and endo-sphere of white mustard during enhanced phytoextraction. The bacterial communities in the rhizosphere were dominated (51.7-68.2%) by Proteobacteria, regardless of the soil treatment or sampling point. A temporary increase in the number of sequences belonging to Gammaproteobacteria (up to 37.3%) was only observed 24 h after the soil treatment with living Pseudomonas sp. H15 cells, whereas for the remaining samples, the relative abundance of this class did not exceed 7.1%. The relative abundance of Proteobacteria in the endosphere of the roots, stems, and leaves of white mustard was higher in the control than in bioaugmented plants. The most pronounced dominance of the Gammaproteobacteria sequences was observed in the stems and leaves of the control plants at the first sampling point, which strongly indicates the ability of the plants to rapidly uptake DNA from soil and translocate it to the aboveground parts of the plants. Additionally, the bioaugmentation of the soil caused a diverse shift in the bacterial communities in the rhizo- and endo-sphere of white mustard compared to control. The most distinct differences, which were dependent on the treatment, were observed in the endosphere of plants at the beginning of the experiment and decreased over time. These results indicate that the rhizo- and endo-biome of white mustard reacts to soil bioaugmentation and may influence the efficiency of bacterial-assisted phytoextraction.
一个可能显著提高植物提取效率的因素是用特定细菌进行土壤生物强化,这可以改变根际和内生细菌群落的组成。本研究的目的是比较用植物促生耐金属内生菌株假单胞菌 H15 的活菌(生物强化)和死菌(对照)处理土壤对增强植物提取过程中白芥菜根际和内生细菌群落组成的影响。无论土壤处理与否或采样点如何,根际细菌群落主要由变形菌门(Proteobacteria)(51.7-68.2%)组成。仅在施用活的假单胞菌 H15 细胞后 24 小时观察到暂时增加属于γ变形菌门(Gammaproteobacteria)的序列数量(高达 37.3%),而对于其余样本,该类别的相对丰度不超过 7.1%。白芥菜根、茎和叶内生细菌中 Proteobacteria 的相对丰度在对照植物中高于生物强化植物。在第一个采样点,对照植物的茎和叶中观察到γ变形菌门序列的优势最为明显,这强烈表明植物具有从土壤中快速摄取 DNA 并将其转运到地上部分的能力。此外,与对照相比,土壤的生物强化导致白芥菜根际和内生细菌群落发生多样化转变。处理依赖性的最显著差异是在实验开始时植物内生细菌中观察到的,并且随着时间的推移而减少。这些结果表明,白芥菜的根际和内生生物区系对土壤生物强化有反应,并可能影响细菌辅助植物提取的效率。