Ranjbar S, Rabiee A R, Ingenhoff L, House J K
Livestock Veterinary Teaching and Research Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Science, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, 2570, Australia.
Rabiee Consulting, Horsley, New South Wales, 2530, Australia.
Aust Vet J. 2020 Jun;98(6):264-269. doi: 10.1111/avj.12933. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
The objective of this study was to investigate farmers' perception of lameness in comparison to the estimated prevalence of lameness in NSW pasture-based dairies to evaluate farmers' perceptions and approaches to detection, treatment and prevention of lameness.
Across-sectional study was conducted on 62 pasture-based dairy farms across NSW, Australia. The prevalence of lameness in these farms was estimated using locomotion scoring (1-4 scale). A survey was also conducted, using a questionnaire and face-to-face interview, to explore farmers' perceived prevalence of lameness and approaches to treatment and prevention.
The prevalence of lameness estimated by farmers was 3.7 times less (mean: 5%; range 0% to 26%) than that determined by locomotion scoring (mean: 19.1%; range 5.0%-44.5%). Approaches to treatment included antimicrobial therapy, hoof inspection with or without application of wooden blocks. In 28% of the farms, the lame cows were managed by farmers or farm staff with no official training in treatment of lame cows. The mean interval from detection of lameness to examination of the affected hoof was almost 55 hours (range 2-720 hours). A very low percentage of farms kept lameness records or implemented lameness preventive strategies such as footbaths and prophylactic foot trimming.
Farmers and farm managers were found to underestimate the prevalence of lameness which could be due to the low level of awareness and can contribute to subsequent lack of implementation of prophylactic procedures and preventive management strategies for lameness. These findings accentuate the need to improve farmers' ability to detect lame cows and to emphasise the importance of recording in order to facilitate the management of lameness in dairy herds.
本研究的目的是调查农民对跛足的认知,并与新南威尔士州草地奶牛场跛足的估计患病率进行比较,以评估农民对跛足检测、治疗和预防的认知及方法。
在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的62个草地奶牛场进行了一项横断面研究。使用运动评分(1 - 4级)估计这些农场中跛足的患病率。还通过问卷调查和面对面访谈进行了一项调查,以探究农民感知到的跛足患病率以及治疗和预防方法。
农民估计的跛足患病率比通过运动评分确定的患病率低3.7倍(平均:5%;范围0%至26%)(平均:19.1%;范围5.0% - 44.5%)。治疗方法包括抗菌治疗、有或无使用木块的蹄部检查。在28%的农场中,跛足奶牛由未接受过治疗跛足奶牛官方培训的农民或农场工作人员管理。从检测到跛足到检查受影响蹄部的平均间隔时间近55小时(范围2 - 720小时)。记录跛足情况或实施诸如足浴和预防性蹄修剪等跛足预防策略的农场比例非常低。
发现农民和农场管理人员低估了跛足的患病率,这可能是由于认识水平较低,并且可能导致随后缺乏对跛足的预防性程序和预防管理策略的实施。这些发现凸显了提高农民检测跛足奶牛能力的必要性,并强调记录对于促进奶牛群跛足管理的重要性。