• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与医护人员在家庭护理中参与跨专业共享决策的意愿相关因素的变化:两项横断面调查的结果。

Variations in factors associated with healthcare providers' intention to engage in interprofessional shared decision making in home care: results of two cross-sectional surveys.

机构信息

Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.

Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université Saint-Étienne, HESPER EA 7425, F-69008 Lyon, F-42023, Saint-Etienne, France.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5064-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-5064-3
PMID:32164669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7069220/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

DOLCE (Improving Decision making On Location of Care with the frail Elderly and their caregivers) was a post-intervention clustered randomised trial (cRT) to assess the effect of training home care teams on interprofessional shared decision-making (IP-SDM). Alongside the cRT, we sought to monitor healthcare providers' level of behavioural intention to engage in an IP-SDM approach and to identify factors associated with this intention.

METHODS

We conducted two cross-sectional surveys in the province of Quebec, Canada, one each at cRT entry and exit. Healthcare providers (e.g. nurses, occupational therapists and social workers) in the 16 participating intervention and control sites self-completed an identical paper-based questionnaire at entry and exit. Informed by the Integrated model for explaining healthcare professionals' clinical behaviour by Godin et al. (2008), we assessed their behavioural intention to engage in IP-SDM to support older adults and caregivers of older adults with cognitive impairment to make health-related housing decisions. We also assessed psychosocial variables underlying their behavioural intention and collected sociodemographic data. We used descriptive statistics and linear mixed models to account for clustering.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2016, 271 healthcare providers participated at study entry and 171 at exit. At entry, median intention level was 6 in a range of 1 (low) to 7 (high) (Interquartile range (IQR): 5-6.5) and factors associated with intention were social influence (β = 0.27, P <  0.0001), beliefs about one's capabilities (β = 0.43, P <  0.0001), moral norm (β = 0.31, P <  0.0001) and beliefs about consequences (β = 0.21, P <  0.0001). At exit, median intention level was 5.5 (IQR: 4.5-6.5). Factors associated with intention were the same but did not include moral norm. However, at exit new factors were kept in the model: working in rehabilitation (β = - 0.39, P = 0.018) and working as a technician (β = - 0.41, P = 0.069) (compared to as a social worker).

CONCLUSION

Intention levels were high but decreased from entry to exit. Factors associated with intention also changed from study entry to study exit. These findings may be explained by the major restructuring of the health and social care system that took place during the 2 years of the study, leading to rapid staff turnover and organisational disturbance in home care teams. Future research should give more attention to contextual factors and design implementation interventions to withstand the disruption of system- and organisational-level disturbances.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02244359). Registered on September 19th, 2014.

摘要

背景

DOLCE(通过与体弱老年人及其照顾者改善位置决策来提高决策)是一项干预后集群随机试验(cRT),旨在评估培训家庭护理团队对跨专业共享决策(IP-SDM)的影响。除了 cRT 之外,我们还试图监测医疗保健提供者参与 IP-SDM 方法的行为意向水平,并确定与该意向相关的因素。

方法

我们在加拿大魁北克省进行了两项横断面调查,一项在 cRT 进入和退出时进行。参与 16 个干预和对照地点的医疗保健提供者(例如护士、职业治疗师和社会工作者)在进入和退出时自行填写了一份完全相同的纸质问卷。根据 Godin 等人(2008 年)解释医疗保健专业人员临床行为的综合模型,我们评估了他们参与 IP-SDM 的行为意向,以支持认知障碍老年人及其照顾者做出与健康相关的住房决策。我们还评估了支持他们行为意向的心理社会变量,并收集了社会人口统计学数据。我们使用描述性统计和线性混合模型来解释聚类。

结果

在 2014 年至 2016 年期间,有 271 名医疗保健提供者在研究开始时参加,171 名在研究结束时参加。在进入时,意向水平中位数为 1 至 7 之间的 6(四分位距(IQR):5-6.5),与意向相关的因素包括社会影响(β=0.27,P<0.0001)、对自己能力的信念(β=0.43,P<0.0001)、道德规范(β=0.31,P<0.0001)和对后果的信念(β=0.21,P<0.0001)。在退出时,意向水平中位数为 5.5(IQR:4.5-6.5)。与意向相关的因素相同,但不包括道德规范。然而,在退出时,新的因素被保留在模型中:在康复工作(β=-0.39,P=0.018)和作为技术员工作(β=-0.41,P=0.069)(与社会工作者相比)。

结论

意向水平较高,但从进入到退出有所下降。与意向相关的因素也从研究开始到研究结束发生了变化。这些发现可能是由于研究期间发生的医疗保健和社会保健系统的重大重组所导致的,这导致家庭护理团队的员工快速更替和组织混乱。未来的研究应更加关注背景因素,并设计实施干预措施,以抵御系统和组织层面干扰的破坏。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT02244359)。2014 年 9 月 19 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5401/7069220/795aad5ad3cc/12913_2020_5064_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5401/7069220/fe0cc0f93ac4/12913_2020_5064_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5401/7069220/795aad5ad3cc/12913_2020_5064_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5401/7069220/fe0cc0f93ac4/12913_2020_5064_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5401/7069220/795aad5ad3cc/12913_2020_5064_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Variations in factors associated with healthcare providers' intention to engage in interprofessional shared decision making in home care: results of two cross-sectional surveys.与医护人员在家庭护理中参与跨专业共享决策的意愿相关因素的变化:两项横断面调查的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5064-3.
2
Changes in intention to use an interprofessional approach to decision-making following training: a cluster before-and-after study.培训后采用跨专业决策方法的意愿变化:一项群组前后研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10899-z.
3
Healthcare providers' intentions to engage in an interprofessional approach to shared decision-making in home care programs: a mixed methods study.医疗保健提供者在家庭护理计划中参与跨专业共享决策方法的意愿:一项混合方法研究。
J Interprof Care. 2013 May;27(3):214-22. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.763777. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
4
Psychosocial Factors of Health Professionals' Intention to Use a Decision Aid for Down Syndrome Screening: Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study.健康专业人员使用唐氏综合征筛查决策辅助工具意愿的社会心理因素:横断面定量研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 25;20(4):e114. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9036.
5
The effect of interprofessional education on healthcare providers' intentions to engage in interprofessional shared decision-making: Perspectives from the theory of planned behaviour.跨专业教育对医疗服务提供者参与跨专业共同决策意愿的影响:基于计划行为理论的视角
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Aug;26(4):1153-1161. doi: 10.1111/jep.13379. Epub 2020 Mar 1.
6
Engaging Caregivers in Health-Related Housing Decisions for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Cluster Randomized Trial.让照顾者参与认知障碍老年人的与健康相关的住房决策:一项集群随机试验。
Gerontologist. 2020 Jul 15;60(5):947-957. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz045.
7
Improving Decision making On Location of Care with the frail Elderly and their caregivers (the DOLCE study): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.改善体弱老年人及其照护者的照护地点决策(DOLCE研究):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Feb 12;16:50. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0567-7.
8
Time to move? Factors associated with burden of care among informal caregivers of cognitively impaired older people facing housing decisions: secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial.是否搬家?认知障碍老年人面临住房决策时,照顾者负担的相关因素:一项集群随机试验的二次分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Sep 9;19(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1249-1.
9
Home care providers' perceptions of shared decision-making with older clients (and their caregivers): A cross-sectional study.家庭护理提供者对与老年客户(及其护理人员)共同决策的看法:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Health Sci. 2022 Jun;24(2):487-498. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12946. Epub 2022 May 13.
10
Shared Decision-Making Training for Home Care Teams to Engage Frail Older Adults and Caregivers in Housing Decisions: Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.针对家庭护理团队的共同决策培训,以促使体弱老年人和护理人员参与住房决策:阶梯式楔形整群随机试验
JMIR Aging. 2022 Sep 20;5(3):e39386. doi: 10.2196/39386.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a team-based versus individual clinician-focused training approach on primary healthcare professionals' intention to have serious illness conversations with patients: A theory-informed process evaluation embedded within a cluster randomized trial.基于团队与以个体临床医生为中心的培训方法对初级医疗保健专业人员与患者进行重病谈话意愿的影响:一项纳入整群随机试验的理论导向过程评估
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 26;20(3):e0298994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298994. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of collaborative oral health care planning between older adults and personnel from public dental care and municipal care organizations: a study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled study in Sweden.老年人与公共牙科护理及市政护理组织人员之间协作口腔保健规划的评估:瑞典一项整群随机对照研究的研究方案
Trials. 2025 Feb 18;26(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08753-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Engaging Caregivers in Health-Related Housing Decisions for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Cluster Randomized Trial.让照顾者参与认知障碍老年人的与健康相关的住房决策:一项集群随机试验。
Gerontologist. 2020 Jul 15;60(5):947-957. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz045.
2
"Please listen to me": A cross-sectional study of experiences of seniors and their caregivers making housing decisions.“请听我说”:一项关于老年人及其照护者在住房决策方面的经验的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0202975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202975. eCollection 2018.
3
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.
Decisional needs for older adults, home health care nurses and dental hygienists during team-based oral health assessments in ordinary home settings - a qualitative study.老年患者、家庭保健护士和牙科保健员在普通家庭环境中进行团队式口腔健康评估时的决策需求 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 23;24(1):779. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05367-6.
4
Changes in intention to use an interprofessional approach to decision-making following training: a cluster before-and-after study.培训后采用跨专业决策方法的意愿变化:一项群组前后研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10899-z.
5
Evaluating the impact of continuing professional development courses on physician behavioral intention: a pre-post study with follow-up at six months.评估继续职业发展课程对医生行为意向的影响:一项在六个月后进行随访的前后研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 3;23(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04597-3.
6
Decisions and Decisional Needs of Canadians From all Provinces and Territories During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Population-Based Cross-sectional Surveys.加拿大各省和地区在 COVID-19 大流行期间的决策和决策需求:基于人口的横断面调查。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Mar 21;9:e43652. doi: 10.2196/43652.
7
Predictors of Decision Regret among Caregivers of Older Canadians Receiving Home Care: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey.接受家庭护理的加拿大老年人的照料者中决策后悔的预测因素:一项横断面在线调查。
MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Aug 11;7(2):23814683221116304. doi: 10.1177/23814683221116304. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
8
Teamwork in home care nursing: A scoping literature review.家庭护理中的团队合作:范围文献综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e3309-e3327. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13910. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
9
Home care providers' perceptions of shared decision-making with older clients (and their caregivers): A cross-sectional study.家庭护理提供者对与老年客户(及其护理人员)共同决策的看法:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Health Sci. 2022 Jun;24(2):487-498. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12946. Epub 2022 May 13.
10
Use of the CPD-REACTION Questionnaire to Evaluate Continuing Professional Development Activities for Health Professionals: Systematic Review.使用CPD反应问卷评估卫生专业人员的继续职业发展活动:系统评价
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 May 2;8(2):e36948. doi: 10.2196/36948.
提高医疗保健专业人员共同决策使用率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(7):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4.
4
Psychosocial Factors of Health Professionals' Intention to Use a Decision Aid for Down Syndrome Screening: Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study.健康专业人员使用唐氏综合征筛查决策辅助工具意愿的社会心理因素:横断面定量研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 25;20(4):e114. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9036.
5
How family caregivers help older relatives navigate statutory services at the end of life: A descriptive qualitative study.家庭照顾者如何帮助老年亲属在生命末期利用法定服务:一项描述性定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jun;32(6):1124-1132. doi: 10.1177/0269216318765853. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
6
Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes.跨专业协作以改善专业实践和医疗保健结果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6(6):CD000072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3.
7
Shared decision making in 2017: International accomplishments in policy, research and implementation.2017年的共同决策:政策、研究与实施方面的国际成就。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 May 23.
8
Responsiveness of a simple tool for assessing change in behavioral intention after continuing professional development activities.一种用于评估继续职业发展活动后行为意向变化的简单工具的反应性。
PLoS One. 2017 May 1;12(5):e0176678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176678. eCollection 2017.
9
Report summary Prevalence and monetary costs of dementia in Canada (2016): a report by the Alzheimer Society of Canada.报告摘要 加拿大(2016 年)痴呆症的患病率和货币成本:加拿大老年痴呆症协会的报告。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016 Oct;36(10):231-232.
10
What are health professionals' intentions toward using research and products of research in clinical practice? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.医疗专业人员在临床实践中使用研究及研究成果的意向是什么?一项系统评价与叙述性综述。
Nurs Open. 2015 Dec 17;3(3):125-139. doi: 10.1002/nop2.40. eCollection 2016 Jul.