Centre for Family Research and Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, UK.
Early Start, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2020 Sep;38(3):458-477. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12328. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
Research has focused on the role of theory of mind (ToM) for positive social behaviour, while the association between ToM and negative social behaviours is less well understood. This longitudinal study compares two mediation models examining the role of ToM and peer-rated social preference at ages 5 and 6 for bullying at age 7. Participants were 114 children (58 boys, M = 67 months) at entry to primary school (T1). At Time 2 (T2), 106 children and, at Time 3 (T3), 96 children remained. Teacher-rated externalizing problems and children's language ability were controlled at T1. Poor ToM was found to indirectly predict later bullying via poor social preference, while for boys only, greater earlier ToM directly predicted greater bullying 2 years later. These results suggest that there are different pathways to bullying via ToM and social preference, which has implications for interventions to prevent the development of bullying behaviour.
研究集中于心理理论(ToM)在积极社会行为中的作用,而 ToM 与消极社会行为之间的关联则不太为人理解。本纵向研究比较了两个中介模型,这些模型检验了 5 岁和 6 岁时的 ToM 和同伴评定的社会偏好在 7 岁时欺凌行为的作用。参与者为进入小学时的 114 名儿童(58 名男孩,M = 67 个月)(T1)。在 T2(T2)时,有 106 名儿童,在 T3(T3)时,有 96 名儿童留了下来。T1 时控制了教师评定的外化问题和儿童的语言能力。较差的 ToM 通过较差的社会偏好间接预测随后的欺凌行为,而对于男孩,较早的较高的 ToM 直接预测两年后更大的欺凌行为。这些结果表明,通过 ToM 和社会偏好存在不同的欺凌行为途径,这对预防欺凌行为发展的干预措施具有意义。