• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过电子健康记录审计日志的网络分析对新生儿重症监护病房的护理团队结构进行建模。

Modeling Care Team Structures in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit through Network Analysis of EHR Audit Logs.

作者信息

Chen You, Lehmann Christoph U, Hatch Leon D, Schremp Emma, Malin Bradley A, France Daniel J

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.

出版信息

Methods Inf Med. 2019 Nov;58(4-05):109-123. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702237. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1702237
PMID:32170716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7356932/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), predefined acuity-based team care models are restricted to core roles and neglect interactions with providers outside of the team, such as interactions that transpire via electronic health record (EHR) systems. These unaccounted interactions may be related to the efficiency of resource allocation, information flow, communication, and thus impact patient outcomes. This study applied network analysis methods to EHR audit logs to model the interactions of providers beyond their core roles to better understand the interaction network patterns of acuity-based teams and relationships of the network structures with postsurgical length of stay (PSLOS).

METHODS

The study used the EHR log data of surgical neonates from a large academic medical center. The study included 104 surgical neonates, for whom 9,206 unique actions were performed by 457 providers in their EHRs. We applied network analysis methods to model EHR provider interaction networks of acuity-based teams in NICU postoperative care. We partitioned each EHR network into three subnetworks based on interaction types: (1) interactions between known core providers who were documented in scheduling records (core subnetwork); (2) interactions between core and noncore providers (extended subnetwork); and (3) interactions between noncore providers (extended subnetwork). For each core subnetwork, we assessed its capability to replicate predefined core-provider relations as documented in scheduling records. We further compared each EHR network, as well as its subnetworks, using standard network measures to determine its differences in network topologies. We conducted a case study to learn provider interaction networks taking care of 15 neonates who underwent gastrostomy tube placement surgery from EHR log data and measure the effectiveness of the interaction networks on PSLOS by the proportional-odds model.

RESULTS

The provider networks of four acuity-based teams (two high and two low acuity), along with their subnetworks, were discovered. We found that beyond capturing the predefined core-provider relations, EHR audit logs can also learn a large number of relations between core and noncore providers or among noncore providers. Providers in the core subnetwork exhibited a greater number of connections with each other than with providers in the extended subnetworks. Many more providers in the core subnetwork serve as a hub than those in the other types of subnetworks. We also found that high-acuity teams exhibited more complex network structures than low-acuity teams, with high-acuity team generating 6,416 interactions between 407 providers compared with 931 interactions between 124 providers, respectively. In addition, we discovered that high-acuity and low-acuity teams shared more than 33 and 25% of providers with each other, respectively, but exhibited different collaborative structures demonstrating that NICU providers shift across different acuity teams and exhibit different network characteristics. Results of case study show that providers, whose patients had lower PSLOS, tended to disperse patient-related information to more colleagues within their network than those who treated higher PSLOS patients ( = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Network analysis can be applied to EHR log data to model acuity-based NICU teams capturing interactions between providers within the predesigned core team as well as those outside of the core team. In the NICU, dissemination of information may be linked to reduced PSLOS. EHR log data provide an efficient, accessible, and research-friendly way to study provider interaction networks. Findings should guide improvements in the EHR system design to facilitate effective interactions between providers.

摘要

背景

在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中,基于预定义 acuity 的团队护理模式仅限于核心角色,而忽视了与团队之外的提供者之间的互动,例如通过电子健康记录(EHR)系统发生的互动。这些未被考虑的互动可能与资源分配效率、信息流、沟通有关,从而影响患者的治疗结果。本研究将网络分析方法应用于 EHR 审计日志,以对超出核心角色的提供者之间的互动进行建模,从而更好地理解基于 acuity 的团队的互动网络模式以及网络结构与术后住院时间(PSLOS)的关系。

方法

本研究使用了一家大型学术医疗中心的手术新生儿的 EHR 日志数据。该研究纳入了 104 名手术新生儿,457 名提供者在其 EHR 中对这些新生儿进行了 9206 次独特操作。我们应用网络分析方法对 NICU 术后护理中基于 acuity 的团队的 EHR 提供者互动网络进行建模。我们根据互动类型将每个 EHR 网络划分为三个子网:(1)调度记录中记录的已知核心提供者之间的互动(核心子网);(2)核心提供者与非核心提供者之间的互动(扩展子网);(3)非核心提供者之间的互动(扩展子网)。对于每个核心子网,我们评估其复制调度记录中记录的预定义核心提供者关系的能力。我们进一步使用标准网络度量比较每个 EHR 网络及其子网,以确定其网络拓扑结构的差异。我们进行了一项案例研究,从 EHR 日志数据中了解照顾接受胃造口管置入手术的 15 名新生儿的提供者互动网络,并通过比例优势模型测量互动网络对 PSLOS 的有效性。

结果

发现了四个基于 acuity 的团队(两个高 acuity 和两个低 acuity)的提供者网络及其子网。我们发现,除了捕捉预定义的核心提供者关系外,EHR 审计日志还可以了解核心提供者与非核心提供者之间或非核心提供者之间的大量关系。核心子网中的提供者彼此之间的连接数量比与扩展子网中的提供者之间的连接数量更多。核心子网中担任枢纽的提供者比其他类型子网中的提供者更多。我们还发现,高 acuity 团队的网络结构比低 acuity 团队更复杂,高 acuity 团队在 407 名提供者之间产生了 6416 次互动,而低 acuity 团队在 124 名提供者之间产生了 931 次互动。此外,我们发现高 acuity 和低 acuity 团队分别有超过 33%和  25%的提供者相互共享,但表现出不同的协作结构,这表明 NICU 的提供者在不同 acuity 团队之间转移,并表现出不同的网络特征。案例研究结果表明,与治疗 PSLOS 较高的患者的提供者相比,其患者 PSLOS 较低的提供者倾向于将与患者相关的信息分散给其网络中的更多同事(P = 0.03)。

结论

网络分析可应用于 EHR 日志数据,以对基于 acuity 的 NICU 团队进行建模,捕捉预先设计的核心团队内部以及核心团队之外的提供者之间的互动。在 NICU中,信息传播可能与降低 PSLOS 有关。EHR 日志数据为研究提供者互动网络提供了一种高效、可访问且有利于研究的方式。研究结果应指导 EHR 系统设计的改进,以促进提供者之间的有效互动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/f7fd1d3ddfc2/nihms-1602880-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/74c00db375fc/nihms-1602880-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/b705570a2fdc/nihms-1602880-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/1694b68208a2/nihms-1602880-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/8c8af2b492d8/nihms-1602880-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/fa1d02ae5add/nihms-1602880-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/b138d2414e90/nihms-1602880-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/f929134fadd5/nihms-1602880-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/f7fd1d3ddfc2/nihms-1602880-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/74c00db375fc/nihms-1602880-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/b705570a2fdc/nihms-1602880-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/1694b68208a2/nihms-1602880-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/8c8af2b492d8/nihms-1602880-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/fa1d02ae5add/nihms-1602880-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/b138d2414e90/nihms-1602880-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/f929134fadd5/nihms-1602880-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62a/7356932/f7fd1d3ddfc2/nihms-1602880-f0008.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling Care Team Structures in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit through Network Analysis of EHR Audit Logs.通过电子健康记录审计日志的网络分析对新生儿重症监护病房的护理团队结构进行建模。
Methods Inf Med. 2019 Nov;58(4-05):109-123. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702237. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
2
Provider Networks in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Associate with Length of Stay.新生儿重症监护病房的医疗服务网络与住院时间相关。
IEEE Conf Collab Internet Comput. 2019 Dec;2019:127-134. doi: 10.1109/CIC48465.2019.00024. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
3
Measuring Collaboration Through Concurrent Electronic Health Record Usage: Network Analysis Study.通过同步电子健康记录使用情况衡量协作:网络分析研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Sep 3;9(9):e28998. doi: 10.2196/28998.
4
Measuring electronic communication networks in virtual care teams using electronic health records access-log data.使用电子健康记录访问日志数据测量虚拟护理团队中的电子通信网络。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Aug;128:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 May 13.
5
Use of Electronic Health Record Access and Audit Logs to Identify Physician Actions Following Noninterruptive Alert Opening: Descriptive Study.利用电子健康记录访问和审计日志识别非中断性警报打开后医生的行为:描述性研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Feb 7;7(1):e12650. doi: 10.2196/12650.
6
Assessing Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Structures and Outcomes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Network Analysis Study.评估 COVID-19 大流行前后新生儿重症监护病房的结构和结果:网络分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 20;23(10):e27261. doi: 10.2196/27261.
7
Measuring Electronic Health Record Use in the Pediatric ICU Using Audit-Logs and Screen Recordings.使用审核日志和屏幕记录测量儿科 ICU 中的电子健康记录使用情况。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):737-744. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733851. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
8
Examining Diurnal Differences in Multidisciplinary Care Teams at a Pediatric Trauma Center Using Electronic Health Record Data: Social Network Analysis.利用电子健康记录数据研究儿科创伤中心多学科护理团队的昼夜差异:社会网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 4;24(2):e30351. doi: 10.2196/30351.
9
Visualizing collaborative electronic health record usage for hospitalized patients with heart failure.可视化心力衰竭住院患者的协作式电子健康记录使用情况。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar;22(2):299-311. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocu017. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
10
Mining tasks and task characteristics from electronic health record audit logs with unsupervised machine learning.使用无监督机器学习从电子健康记录审核日志中挖掘任务和任务特征。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jun 12;28(6):1168-1177. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa338.

引用本文的文献

1
Reimagining clinical AI: from clickstreams to clinical insights with EHR use metadata.重新构想临床人工智能:利用电子健康记录使用元数据从点击流中获取临床见解。
Npj Health Syst. 2025;2(1):33. doi: 10.1038/s44401-025-00040-5. Epub 2025 Sep 4.
2
A Scoping Review of Multilevel Patient-Sharing Network Measures in Health Services Research.卫生服务研究中多层次患者共享网络措施的范围综述
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Jun;82(3):203-224. doi: 10.1177/10775587241304140. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
3
Unlocking inpatient workload insights with electronic health record event logs.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Adjusting Health Care Provider Collaboration Networks.风险调整医疗服务提供者协作网络。
Methods Inf Med. 2019 Sep;58(2-03):71-78. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694990. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
2
Interaction patterns of trauma providers are associated with length of stay.创伤提供者的互动模式与住院时间有关。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Jul 1;25(7):790-799. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy009.
3
Learning bundled care opportunities from electronic medical records.从电子病历中学习捆绑式护理的机会。
利用电子健康记录事件日志解锁住院患者工作量洞察。
J Hosp Med. 2025 Jan;20(1):79-84. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13386. Epub 2024 May 5.
4
Assessing Intrahospital Care Transition Structures Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Network Analysis Study.评估新冠疫情之前及期间的院内护理过渡结构:网络分析研究
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2023 Jun 16;2023:148-156. eCollection 2023.
5
The Use of Electronic Health Record Metadata to Identify Nurse-Patient Assignments in the Intensive Care Unit: Algorithm Development and Validation.利用电子健康记录元数据识别重症监护病房中的护士-患者分配:算法开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Nov 9;10(11):e37923. doi: 10.2196/37923.
6
Using event logs to observe interactions with electronic health records: an updated scoping review shows increasing use of vendor-derived measures.利用事件日志观察与电子健康记录的交互:更新的范围综述显示,越来越多地使用供应商提供的指标。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Dec 13;30(1):144-154. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac177.
7
Using electronic health record audit log data for research: insights from early efforts.利用电子健康记录审核日志数据进行研究:早期努力的见解。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Dec 13;30(1):167-171. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac173.
8
Teamwork and Patient Safety in Intensive Care Units: Challenges and Opportunities.重症监护病房中的团队合作与患者安全:挑战与机遇。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:469-473. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220120.
9
Perioperative Care Structures and Non-Routine Events: Network Analysis.围手术期护理结构和非例行事件:网络分析。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:359-363. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220096.
10
Assessing Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Structures and Outcomes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Network Analysis Study.评估 COVID-19 大流行前后新生儿重症监护病房的结构和结果:网络分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 20;23(10):e27261. doi: 10.2196/27261.
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jan;77:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
4
Guidelines for the Institutional Implementation of Developmental Neuroprotective Care in the NICU. Part B: Recommendations and Justification. A Joint Position Statement From the CANN, CAPWHN, NANN, and COINN.新生儿重症监护病房发育性神经保护护理机构实施指南。B部分:建议与理由。加拿大新生儿护理协会、加拿大围产期和妇女健康护理护士协会、国家新生儿护理协会及国际新生儿护理网络联合立场声明
Can J Nurs Res. 2017 Jun;49(2):63-74. doi: 10.1177/0844562117708126.
5
Using telephony data to facilitate discovery of clinical workflows.利用电话数据促进临床工作流程的发现。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Apr 19;8(2):381-395. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-11-RA-0191.
6
Teamwork in the NICU Setting and Its Association with Health Care-Associated Infections in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants.新生儿重症监护病房环境中的团队合作及其与极低出生体重儿医疗相关感染的关联
Am J Perinatol. 2017 Aug;34(10):1032-1040. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601563. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
7
Identifying collaborative care teams through electronic medical record utilization patterns.通过电子病历使用模式识别协作护理团队。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e111-e120. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw124.
8
Inferring Clinical Workflow Efficiency via Electronic Medical Record Utilization.通过电子病历利用情况推断临床工作流程效率
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:416-25. eCollection 2015.
9
Exploring the impact of different multi-level measures of physician communities in patient-centric care networks on healthcare outcomes: A multi-level regression approach.探索以患者为中心的医疗网络中不同多层次医生社区测量方法对医疗结果的影响:一种多层次回归方法。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 4;6:20222. doi: 10.1038/srep20222.
10
Improved cosine similarity measures of simplified neutrosophic sets for medical diagnoses.改进的简化 Neutrosophic 集余弦相似度度量在医学诊断中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2015 Mar;63(3):171-9. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 26.