J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Apr;149(4):649. doi: 10.1037/xge0000761.
Reports an error in "False memories, false preferences: Flexible retrieval mechanisms supporting successful inference bias novel decisions" by Alexis C. Carpenter and Daniel L. Schacter (, 2018[Jul], Vol 147[7], 988-1004). In the article the incorrect version of Figure 4 was published. The correct Figure 4 is provided in the erratum. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2018-05307-001.) Prior research suggests that episodic memory can guide value-based decisions when single episodes are encoded in relation to the specific reward-context in which they were experienced. The current experiments examine the role that a flexible recombination-related retrieval mechanism that allows one to link together distinct events plays in the misattribution of specific reward-contexts across distinct episodes. To determine whether the same recombination-related retrieval mechanism supports both successful inference and transfer of reward-context across episodes, we developed a modified version of an associative inference paradigm in which participants encoded overlapping associations (AB, BC) that could later be linked to support inferential retrieval (AC), where one element ("A") was tied to reward. Our key experimental manipulation concerned whether value memory (Experiments 1 and 2) or decision bias tests (Experiment 3) were probed before or after the associative inference test, thereby allowing us to assess whether false value transfer and decision bias scores increased after as compared to before successful versus unsuccessful inference. Results revealed that participants more frequently misattributed the specific reward-context ("A") to unrewarded items ("C;" Experiments 1 and 2) and showed higher decision bias scores when asked to choose between two previously unrewarded items ("C;" Experiment 3) for successful compared with unsuccessful inference, but only when the value memory and decision bias tests were given after the associative inference test. These results suggest that a recombination-related retrieval mechanism that supports successful inference also contributes to the misattribution of reward-context in memory and further biases participants' novel value-based decisions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
报告了 Alexis C. Carpenter 和 Daniel L. Schacter 的“虚假记忆,虚假偏好:支持成功推理偏差新决策的灵活检索机制”(,2018[7 月],第 147 卷[7],988-1004)中的错误。文章中发表了错误的图 4。提供了正确的图 4 在勘误表中。本文的在线版本已更正。(原始文章的摘要如下:先前的研究表明,当单个情节以与特定奖励上下文相关的方式进行编码时,情节记忆可以指导基于价值的决策。当前的实验研究了灵活的重组相关检索机制在特定奖励背景在不同情节中的错误归因中的作用。为了确定相同的重组相关检索机制是否支持成功推理和跨情节的奖励上下文转移,我们开发了一种修改后的联想推理范式,参与者在其中编码重叠的关联(AB,BC),然后可以链接以支持推理检索(AC),其中一个元素(“A”)与奖励相关联。我们的关键实验操作涉及在进行联想推理测试之前或之后,对价值记忆(实验 1 和 2)或决策偏差测试(实验 3)进行探测,从而使我们能够评估在成功与不成功推理之后,虚假价值转移和决策偏差分数是否会增加。结果表明,与不成功推理相比,参与者更频繁地将特定的奖励背景(“A”)错误地归因于未奖励的项目(“C”;实验 1 和 2),并且在被要求在两个先前未奖励的项目(“C”)之间进行选择时,他们的决策偏差分数更高,当被要求在联想推理测试后进行价值记忆和决策偏差测试时,成功推理比不成功推理更有可能。这些结果表明,支持成功推理的重组相关检索机制也有助于记忆中奖励背景的错误归因,并进一步影响参与者的新基于价值的决策。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。