Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130(12):E970-E975. doi: 10.1002/lary.28613. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
To evaluate/compare normative electrophysiologic electromyography (EMG) response characteristics of recurrent laryngeal, vagus, and external branch of superior laryngeal nerve evoked with different stimulators used in neuromonitored thyroid surgery.
Prospective crossover study METHODS: EMG responses obtained via endotracheal tube surface electrodes in 11 patients undergoing thyroid surgery were recorded when stimulated with four stimulators: two monopolar (Prass standard and ball tip), one bipolar, and one dissecting instrument. Normative mean EMG results including latency, amplitude, threshold, saturation currents, and distance-sensitivity were compared.
The Prass standard stimulator had shorter latency time when nerve was not covered with fascia (P = .04). The bipolar, dissecting instrument, and ball tip demonstrated similar latency times with and without nerve fascia. Pooled mean latency increased significantly from 1.86 ms to 2.16 ms when comparing nerves without fascia and nerves with fascia (P < .05). The Prass standard monopolar stimulator had the lowest mean threshold at 0.40 mA, with the dissecting instrument having the highest threshold at 0.89 mA for dissected nerve. Pooled mean threshold and saturation increased from 0.6 mA to 1.7 mA (P < .0001) and 1.57 mA to 4.15 mA (P < .001) with fascia covering nerve, respectively. The mean depolarization rate was 100% for monopolar and bipolar electrodes and 81% for dissecting instrument at 1 mA. Only 9% of monopolar electrodes generated an EMG response when stimulated from 2 mm away.
Monopolar stimulators are more sensitive for neural mapping, whereas bipolar instruments are more specific, thus reducing false positive stimulation. Dissecting instruments share many features of monopolar stimulators while being more specific, and thus are a viable alternative.
2b Laryngoscope, 2020.
评估/比较不同神经监测甲状腺手术中使用的刺激器对喉返神经、迷走神经和上喉神经外支诱发的正常电生理肌电图(EMG)反应特征。
前瞻性交叉研究。
对 11 例甲状腺手术患者经气管内表面电极记录的 EMG 反应,分别用 4 种刺激器进行刺激:2 种单极(Prass 标准和球头)、1 种双极和 1 种解剖仪器。比较正常的平均 EMG 结果,包括潜伏期、振幅、阈值、饱和电流和距离灵敏度。
当神经未被筋膜覆盖时,Prass 标准刺激器的潜伏期较短(P =.04)。双极、解剖仪器和球头在有无神经筋膜时具有相似的潜伏期。当比较无筋膜和有筋膜的神经时,总的平均潜伏期从 1.86ms 显著增加到 2.16ms(P<.05)。Prass 标准单极刺激器的平均阈值最低为 0.40mA,而解剖仪器的阈值最高为 0.89mA 用于解剖神经。总的平均阈值和饱和度从 0.6mA 增加到 1.7mA(P<.0001)和 1.57mA 增加到 4.15mA(P<.001),神经有筋膜覆盖。在 1mA 时,单极和双极电极的去极化率为 100%,解剖仪器为 81%。只有 9%的单极电极在距离 2mm 处刺激时产生 EMG 反应。
单极刺激器对神经定位更敏感,而双极仪器更具特异性,从而减少假阳性刺激。解剖仪器具有单极刺激器的许多特征,同时具有特异性,因此是一种可行的替代方法。
2b 级喉镜,2020 年。