Department of Zoology, Tri-Chandra Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal.
Nepal Biodiversity Research Society, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Primates. 2020 Jul;61(4):603-621. doi: 10.1007/s10329-020-00810-9. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
Resource partitioning reduces the competition between different species within the same habitat, promoting their coexistence. To understand how such species co-adapt to reduce conflicts, we examined the behavior of two primates, Assamese macaque (Macaca assamensis) and rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta), from April 2017 to March 2018 in Sivapuri Nagarjun National Park (SNNP), Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. We performed 1580 and 1261 scan sessions on wild multi-male/multi-female groups of Assamese and rhesus macaques, respectively, at 15-min sampling intervals. Assamese macaques consumed fewer plant species (38 species) than rhesus macaques (88 species). Overlapping food sources between the macaque species resulted in a Pianka index of 0.5. Assamese macaques consumed more items of tree, climber, and vine species, whereas rhesus macaques fed on more shrub, herb, and grass species. The proportions of plant parts consumed by the two species differed-more leaves, fruits and cones were used by Assamese macaques than rhesus macaques, whereas more flowers, seeds, and pods were consumed by rhesus macaques than Assamese macaques. Assamese macaques had a smaller home range (0.55 km) than rhesus macaques (4.23 km), and Assamese macaques had a shorter daily moving distance (1.6 km) than rhesus macaques (4.0 km). Although feeding time did not differ between the two macaque species, less time was devoted to social activities by Assamese macaques (16.0%) than by rhesus macaques (33.7%). Assamese macaques were generally arboreal, with 94.0% of their activities in trees, whereas rhesus macaques were largely terrestrial, with 58.5% of their activities on the ground. These differences in food selection, home-range size, ranging and activity patterns, and habitat use suggest that Assamese and rhesus macaques reduce resource competition through resource partitioning to coexist in a landscape matrix.
资源分区减少了同一栖息地内不同物种之间的竞争,促进了它们的共存。为了了解这些物种如何共同适应以减少冲突,我们从 2017 年 4 月至 2018 年 3 月在尼泊尔加德满都山谷的锡瓦普里纳加尔朱恩国家公园(SNNP)对两种灵长类动物——阿萨姆猕猴(Macaca assamensis)和恒河猕猴(Macaca mulatta)进行了研究。我们对野生的多雄性/多雌性阿萨姆猕猴和恒河猕猴群体分别进行了 1580 次和 1261 次扫描,采样间隔为 15 分钟。阿萨姆猕猴食用的植物种类(38 种)少于恒河猕猴(88 种)。由于两种猕猴的食物来源重叠,其 Pianka 指数为 0.5。阿萨姆猕猴食用的树木、藤本植物和藤本植物种类更多,而恒河猕猴则食用更多的灌木、草本植物和草类植物。两种物种食用的植物部位比例不同——阿萨姆猕猴食用的叶子、果实和球果较多,而恒河猕猴食用的花、种子和荚果较多。阿萨姆猕猴的活动范围(0.55 平方公里)比恒河猕猴(4.23 平方公里)小,日移动距离(1.6 公里)也比恒河猕猴(4.0 公里)短。虽然两种猕猴的觅食时间没有差异,但阿萨姆猕猴的社交活动时间(16.0%)比恒河猕猴(33.7%)少。阿萨姆猕猴通常在树上活动,其活动的 94.0%在树上,而恒河猕猴则主要在地面上活动,其活动的 58.5%在地面上。这些在食物选择、活动范围大小、活动范围和活动模式以及栖息地利用方面的差异表明,阿萨姆猕猴和恒河猕猴通过资源分区来减少资源竞争,以在景观基质中共存。