Suppr超能文献

临床推理评估:思维的三种演变

Assessment of clinical reasoning: three evolutions of thought.

作者信息

Schuwirth Lambert W T, Durning Steven J, King Svetlana M

机构信息

Prideaux Centre for Research in Health Professions Education, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 Aug 27;7(3):191-196. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0096.

Abstract

Although assessing clinical reasoning is almost universally considered central to medical education it is not a straightforward issue. In the past decades, our insights into clinical reasoning as a phenomenon, and consequently the best ways to assess it, have undergone significant changes. In this article, we describe how the interplay between fundamental research, practical applications, and evaluative research has pushed the evolution of our thinking and our practices in assessing clinical reasoning.

摘要

尽管评估临床推理几乎被普遍认为是医学教育的核心,但这并非一个简单的问题。在过去几十年里,我们对临床推理这一现象的认识,以及因此对评估它的最佳方法的认识,都发生了重大变化。在本文中,我们描述了基础研究、实际应用和评估研究之间的相互作用如何推动了我们在评估临床推理方面的思维和实践的演变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验