Phillips Beth M, Zhao Yuting, Weekley M Jane
Florida State University.
Early Educ Dev. 2018;29(3):379-397. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2017.1408371. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
This study reports initial descriptive and validity results of a new early childhood classroom observation measure, the Classroom Language Environment Observation Scales (CLEOS), designed to capture teachers' use of both implicit language supports (e.g., incidental scaffolding and shared reading) and more explicit language instruction (e.g., direct vocabulary instruction). Classrooms ( = ) serving at-risk three-to-five year-old children, and representing child care, Head Start and public prekindergarten were observed; a subgroup was also observed with the Teacher Behavior Rating Scale (TBRS), a well-validated tool. Results indicated limited use of most language-support strategies, particularly those that were more explicit. Concurrent validity for the CLEOS was supported via significant correlations with TBRS subscales. Greater use of higher quality linguistic input was significantly associated with teachers' years of experience but not with their educational level. Findings supported the differential inclusion of linguistic input across settings, with large group circle timebeing the most frequent setting for explicit instructional input and centers being the most frequent setting for incidental supports.
Study results suggest a need to improve the professional development and preservice training for preschool teachers related to supporting rich language interactions and explicit language and vocabulary instruction within classrooms.
本研究报告了一种新的幼儿课堂观察工具——课堂语言环境观察量表(CLEOS)的初步描述性和效度结果,该量表旨在记录教师对隐性语言支持(如偶然的支架搭建和分享阅读)和更明确的语言教学(如直接的词汇教学)的运用情况。研究观察了为三到五岁高危儿童提供服务的各类课堂( = ),这些课堂涵盖了儿童保育机构、启智计划项目以及公立学前班;还使用经过充分验证的教师行为评定量表(TBRS)对一个子样本进行了观察。结果表明,大多数语言支持策略的使用有限,尤其是那些更明确的策略。CLEOS与TBRS分量表之间的显著相关性支持了其同时效度。更高质量语言输入的更多使用与教师的教龄显著相关,但与他们的教育水平无关。研究结果支持了不同环境中语言输入的差异,其中大组围坐时间是明确教学输入最频繁的环境,而活动中心是偶然支持最频繁的环境。
研究结果表明,需要改进针对学前教师的专业发展和职前培训,以支持课堂内丰富的语言互动以及明确的语言和词汇教学。