Saiki Aya, Otsuki Michio, Mukai Kosuke, Hayashi Reiko, Shimomura Iichiro, Kurihara Isao, Ichijo Takamasa, Takeda Yoshiyu, Katabami Takuyuki, Tsuiki Mika, Wada Norio, Ogawa Yoshihiro, Kawashima Junji, Sone Masakatsu, Inagaki Nobuya, Yoshimoto Takanobu, Okamoto Ryuji, Takahashi Katsutoshi, Kobayashi Hiroki, Tamura Kouichi, Kamemura Kohei, Yamamoto Koichi, Izawa Shoichiro, Kakutani Miki, Yamada Masanobu, Tanabe Akiyo, Naruse Mitsuhide
Department of Metabolic Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Nephrology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Endocr Soc. 2020 Feb 13;4(4):bvaa011. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvaa011. eCollection 2020 Apr 1.
Normal basal plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) reflects mild aldosterone excess compared to high basal PAC. We previously reported lower risk for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) and normal basal PAC (nPA) than in those with high basal PAC (hPA). However, the differences in therapeutic outcomes between nPA and hPA are unclear. The aim of this multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study was to determine the clinical significance of nPA to therapeutic outcomes, including adrenalectomy (ADX) and treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs).
A total of 1146 patients with PA who were diagnosed and underwent adrenal venous sampling (AVS) between January 2006 and October 2016 were enrolled. The clinical parameters at baseline and after ADX or treatment with MRA were compared between the nPA and hPA groups.
Significantly higher rates of absent clinical success (36.6 vs. 21.9%, = 0.01) and absent biochemical success (26.4 vs. 5.2%, < 0.01) were found for the nPA group than for the hPA group, respectively. Logistic regression analysis identified baseline PAC as a significant independent predictor of absent clinical success of ADX and MRAs.
Plasma aldosterone concentration at baseline was a significant and independent predictor of absent clinical success of ADX and MRA. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist treatment appeared to be a better therapeutic choice than ADX in the nPA group.
与高基础血浆醛固酮浓度(PAC)相比,正常基础PAC反映了轻度醛固酮过量。我们之前报道,原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)且基础PAC正常(nPA)的患者发生心血管和脑血管事件的风险低于基础PAC高(hPA)的患者。然而,nPA和hPA之间治疗结果的差异尚不清楚。这项多机构回顾性队列研究的目的是确定nPA对治疗结果(包括肾上腺切除术(ADX)和使用盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)治疗)的临床意义。
纳入2006年1月至2016年10月期间诊断并接受肾上腺静脉采样(AVS)的1146例PA患者。比较nPA组和hPA组基线时以及ADX或MRA治疗后的临床参数。
nPA组临床治疗未成功(36.6%对21.9%,P = 0.01)和生化治疗未成功(26.4%对5.2%,P < 0.01)的发生率分别显著高于hPA组。逻辑回归分析确定基线PAC是ADX和MRA临床治疗未成功的显著独立预测因素。
基线血浆醛固酮浓度是ADX和MRA临床治疗未成功的显著独立预测因素。在nPA组中,盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂治疗似乎是比ADX更好的治疗选择。