Wong Samford, Subong Paul, Graham Allison, Wail Ahmed, Derry Fadel, Saif Mofid, Belci Maurizio
National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK.
School of Health Science, University of London, London, UK.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2022 Jan;45(1):151-154. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1737789. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
The impact of mechanical ventilation on energy expenditure after spinal cord injury (SCI) is sparse. The objective of this case-series is to measure 15-minutes resting metabolic rate (RMR) to determine 24-hours measured-RMR (m-RMR) using QUARK indirect calorimeter (IC) and; compare the m-RMR with estimated RMR (e-RMR) using four commonly used predictive equations (Harris-Benedict, Mifflin St-Jeor, Henry and Schofield). We measured the RMR of four patients with SCI (one male and three female; mean age: 58.3 years) all with complete tetraplegia (ISNCSCI A) twice in a one-week interval using an IC with two sampling flow settings during a six month period. The median (IQ) of all m-RMRs was 1094 (340.2) kcal/day. The median m-RMR was 40.1% lower than the median calculated with four different e-RMRs using predictive equations. All four predictive equations overestimated RMR in SCI patients requiring mechanical ventilation by 4.1-61.1% (Harris-Benedict: 28.8-60.6%; Mifflin St-Jeor: 6.9-61.1%; Henry: 4.1-58.9% and; Schofield: 6-54.6%). There is a high variability of e-RMR and m-RMR in patients with SCI who are dependent on mechanical ventilation. The use of predictive equations may lead to over-estimation of energy requirements. To avoid overfeeding we recommended measuring RMR using IC wherever possible. A further study with a larger sample size is needed due to the small number of subjects in our case-series. Development of a validated RMR equation in the SCI population is warranted.
机械通气对脊髓损伤(SCI)后能量消耗的影响研究较少。本病例系列研究的目的是使用QUARK间接热量计(IC)测量15分钟静息代谢率(RMR),以确定24小时实测RMR(m-RMR);并使用四个常用的预测方程(Harris-Benedict、Mifflin St-Jeor、Henry和Schofield)将m-RMR与估计RMR(e-RMR)进行比较。我们在六个月的时间里,使用IC在两种采样流量设置下,对四名脊髓损伤患者(一名男性和三名女性;平均年龄:58.3岁)进行了测量,所有患者均为完全性四肢瘫(ISNCSCI A级),并在一周的间隔内进行了两次测量。所有m-RMR的中位数(四分位数间距)为1094(340.2)千卡/天。m-RMR的中位数比使用预测方程计算的四种不同e-RMR的中位数低40.1%。所有四个预测方程均高估了需要机械通气的SCI患者的RMR,高估幅度为4.1%-61.1%(Harris-Benedict:28.8%-60.6%;Mifflin St-Jeor:6.9%-61.1%;Henry:4.1%-58.9%;Schofield:6%-54.6%)。依赖机械通气的SCI患者的e-RMR和m-RMR存在很大差异。使用预测方程可能会导致对能量需求的高估。为避免过度喂养,我们建议尽可能使用IC测量RMR。由于本病例系列中的受试者数量较少,需要进行更大样本量的进一步研究。有必要在SCI人群中开发经过验证的RMR方程。