Suppr超能文献

单穿刺与双穿刺对肺静脉隔离术结果和并发症的影响。

Impact of single versus double transseptal puncture on outcome and complications in pulmonary vein isolation procedures.

机构信息

Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center University Leipzig, Germany.

Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Cardiol J. 2021;28(5):671-677. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0037. Epub 2020 Mar 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the current study was to analyze the impact of single versus double transseptal puncture (TSP) for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation were prospectively included in the AF ablation registry and were analyzed according to single versus double TSP.

RESULTS

A total of 478 patients (female 35%, persistent AF 67%) undergoing AF ablation between 01/2014 and 09/2014 were included. Single TSP was performed in 202 (42%) patients, double TSP in 276 (58%) patients. Age, gender, body mass index, CHA2DS2-VASc score, left ventricular ejection fraction and operator experience (experienced operator defined as ≥ 5 years of experience in invasive electrophysiology) were equally distributed between the two groups. Repeat procedures (re-dos) were more frequently performed using single TSP access (p < 0.001). Left atrial (LA) diameter was larger in patients with double TSP (p = 0.001). Procedure duration in single TSP was identical to double TSP procedures (p = 0.823). Radiation duration was similar between the two groups (p = 0.217). There were 49 (10%) patients with complications after catheter ablation. There were no differences between complication rates and TSP type (p = 0.555). Similarly, recurrence rates were comparable between both TSP groups (p = 0.788).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no clear benefit of single or double TSP in AF ablation.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在分析用于房颤消融的单次与双次房间隔穿刺(TSP)的影响。

方法

连续的房颤消融患者前瞻性地纳入房颤消融登记处,并根据单次与双次 TSP 进行分析。

结果

共纳入 2014 年 1 月至 2014 年 9 月期间行房颤消融的 478 例患者(女性占 35%,持续性房颤占 67%)。202 例(42%)患者行单次 TSP,276 例(58%)患者行双次 TSP。两组间年龄、性别、体重指数、CHA2DS2-VASc 评分、左心室射血分数和术者经验(经验丰富的术者定义为有≥5 年的介入电生理经验)相当。单次 TSP 组更常进行重复手术(再介入)(p<0.001)。双次 TSP 患者的左心房(LA)直径更大(p=0.001)。单次 TSP 与双次 TSP 程序的手术时间相同(p=0.823)。两组间辐射时间相似(p=0.217)。导管消融后有 49 例(10%)患者出现并发症。并发症发生率与 TSP 类型之间无差异(p=0.555)。同样,两组 TSP 的复发率相当(p=0.788)。

结论

房颤消融中单次与双次 TSP 均无明显优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fe2/8428934/864e6cfdc4b8/cardj-28-5-671f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验