Cooper Anna R, Wilke Benjamin, Scarborough Mark, Gibbs C Parker, Spiguel Andre
Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, USA.
Orthopaedics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA.
Cureus. 2020 Feb 19;12(2):e7040. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7040.
Background Pediatric patients with sarcomas are at risk of poor quality of life outcomes. The National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) improves our ability to capture patient-reported outcomes. Do physical function, social, and mental health PROMIS outcomes for pediatric patients with non-metastatic malignant sarcomas differ from the U.S. pediatric population? Methods Six pediatric PROMIS short forms were collected for patient visits to orthopedic oncology at a tertiary referral center from September 1, 2016, to March 31, 2017. Mean T-scores differed from the reference population by a one-sample t-test. Results Of the 30 eligible patients, five had soft-tissue sarcomas and 25 (83%) had bone sarcomas. The mean age of the cohort was 13 years (5-17). The study cohort had a mean physical function T-score of 39.8 (SD 9.8), which was worse than the reference population. In contrast, the mean peer relationship T-score of 54.3 (SD 8.8) and mean depression T-score of 42.0 (SD 9.1) were better than the reference population. Conclusions Pediatric patients with non-metastatic sarcomas had a worse physical function but a better peer relationship and depression scores than the U.S. PROMIS reference population. Ceiling and flooring effects were reported. The level of evidence was III.
患有肉瘤的儿科患者存在生活质量不佳的风险。美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS®)提高了我们获取患者报告结局的能力。非转移性恶性肉瘤儿科患者的身体功能、社交和心理健康PROMIS结局与美国儿科人群有差异吗?方法:收集了2016年9月1日至2017年3月31日在一家三级转诊中心骨科肿瘤门诊就诊患者的6种儿科PROMIS简表。通过单样本t检验比较平均T分数与参考人群的差异。结果:在30例符合条件的患者中,5例患有软组织肉瘤,25例(83%)患有骨肉瘤。该队列的平均年龄为13岁(5 - 17岁)。研究队列的平均身体功能T分数为39.8(标准差9.8),低于参考人群。相比之下,平均同伴关系T分数为54.3(标准差8.8),平均抑郁T分数为42.0(标准差9.1),高于参考人群。结论:与美国PROMIS参考人群相比,非转移性肉瘤儿科患者的身体功能较差,但同伴关系和抑郁评分较好。报告了天花板效应和地板效应。证据级别为III级。