• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体何时能使自身的广义适合度最大化?

When Do Individuals Maximize Their Inclusive Fitness?

出版信息

Am Nat. 2020 Apr;195(4):717-732. doi: 10.1086/707561. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1086/707561
PMID:32216664
Abstract

Adaptation is often described in behavioral ecology as individuals maximizing their inclusive fitness. Under what conditions does this hold, and how does this relate to the gene-centered perspective of adaptation? We unify and extend the literature on these questions to class-structured populations. We demonstrate that the maximization (in the best-response sense) of class-specific inclusive fitness obtains in uninvadable population states (meaning that all deviating mutants become extinct). This defines a genuine actor-centered perspective on adaptation. But this inclusive fitness is assigned to all bearers of a mutant allele in a given class and depends on distributions of demographic and genetic contexts. These distributions, in turn, usually depend on events in previous generations and are thus not under individual control. This prevents, in general, envisioning individuals themselves as autonomous fitness maximizers, each with its own inclusive fitness. For weak selection, however, the dependence on earlier events can be neglected. We then show that each individual in each class appears to maximize its own inclusive fitness when all other individuals exhibit inclusive fitness-maximizing behavior. This defines a genuine individual-centered perspective of adaptation and justifies formally, as a first-order approximation, the long-heralded view of individuals appearing to maximize their own inclusive fitness.

摘要

适应通常在行为生态学中被描述为个体最大化其适合度。在什么条件下可以实现这一点,以及这与适应的以基因为中心的观点有何关系?我们将这些问题的文献统一并扩展到具有阶层结构的群体中。我们证明,在不可入侵的种群状态下(即所有偏离的突变体都会灭绝),特定阶层的适合度最大化(在最佳反应意义上)。这定义了一种真正的以行动者为中心的适应观点。但是,这种适合度被分配给给定阶层中具有突变等位基因的所有携带者,并且取决于人口统计和遗传背景的分布。这些分布反过来通常取决于前几代的事件,因此不受个体控制。这通常阻止将个体自身视为自主的适应最大化者,每个个体都有自己的适合度。然而,对于弱选择,可以忽略对早期事件的依赖。然后,我们表明,当所有其他个体都表现出最大化适合度的行为时,每个阶层的每个个体似乎都在最大化自己的适合度。这定义了一种真正的以个体为中心的适应观点,并在一阶近似意义上正式证明了个体似乎最大化自己适合度的长期以来的观点。

相似文献

1
When Do Individuals Maximize Their Inclusive Fitness?个体何时能使自身的广义适合度最大化?
Am Nat. 2020 Apr;195(4):717-732. doi: 10.1086/707561. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
2
Does evolution lead to maximizing behavior?进化会导致最大化行为吗?
Evolution. 2015 Jul;69(7):1858-73. doi: 10.1111/evo.12701. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
3
Inclusive fitness from multitype branching processes.多分支过程的广义适合度。
Bull Math Biol. 2011 May;73(5):1028-51. doi: 10.1007/s11538-010-9551-2. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
4
Inclusive fitness maximization: An axiomatic approach.广义适合度最大化:一种公理方法。
J Theor Biol. 2014 Jun 7;350:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
5
The strategic reference gene: an organismal theory of inclusive fitness.战略参考基因:适合度广义理论的机体论。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jun 12;286(1904):20190459. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0459.
6
Limitations of inclusive fitness.内含适应性的局限性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 10;110(50):20135-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317588110. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
7
Adaptation and inclusive fitness.适应与适合度。
Curr Biol. 2013 Jul 8;23(13):R577-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.031.
8
Invasion fitness, inclusive fitness, and reproductive numbers in heterogeneous populations.异质种群中的入侵适合度、广义适合度和繁殖数
Evolution. 2016 Aug;70(8):1689-702. doi: 10.1111/evo.12980. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
9
Inclusive fitness analysis on mathematical groups.数学群体的包容性适合度分析。
Evolution. 2011 Mar;65(3):849-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01162.x. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
10
Inclusive fitness is an indispensable approximation for understanding organismal design.包容性适合度是理解生物体设计不可或缺的近似值。
Evolution. 2019 Jun;73(6):1066-1076. doi: 10.1111/evo.13739. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonlinear social evolution and the emergence of collective action.非线性社会演化与集体行动的出现
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Mar 27;3(4):pgae131. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae131. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Symmetry in models of natural selection.自然选择模型中的对称性。
J R Soc Interface. 2023 Nov;20(208):20230306. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0306. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
3
How to make an inclusive-fitness model.如何构建包容性适应度模型。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Oct 11;290(2008):20231310. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1310. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
4
Modelling cultural selection on biological fitness to integrate social transmission and adaptive explanations for human behaviour.构建基于生物适应性的文化选择模型,以整合对人类行为的社会传播和适应性解释。
Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Apr 23;2:e10. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.12. eCollection 2020.
5
Evolutionarily stable strategy analysis and its links to demography and genetics through invasion fitness.进化稳定策略分析及其通过入侵适合度与人口统计学和遗传学的联系。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 May 8;378(1876):20210496. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0496. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
6
Evolutionarily stable preferences.进化稳定偏好
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 May 8;378(1876):20210505. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0505. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
7
Genetic conflicts and the case for licensed anthropomorphizing.基因冲突与许可拟人化的理由。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2022;76(12):166. doi: 10.1007/s00265-022-03267-6. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
8
Multiple social encounters can eliminate Crozier's paradox and stabilise genetic kin recognition.多次社交接触可以消除克罗泽悖论并稳定遗传亲缘识别。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 6;13(1):3902. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31545-4.
9
Long-term overlap of social and genetic structure in free-ranging house mice reveals dynamic seasonal and group size effects.自由放养家鼠的社会结构和遗传结构长期重叠揭示了动态季节和群体规模效应。
Curr Zool. 2021 Feb;67(1):59-69. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoaa030. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
10
The Price equation and reproductive value.价格方程和生殖值。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Apr 27;375(1797):20190356. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0356. Epub 2020 Mar 9.