Bajpai Basant K, Zakelis Rolandas, Deimantavicius Mantas, Imbrasiene Daiva
Health Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51423 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Department of Health Promotion and Rehabilitation, Lithuanian Sports University, LT-44221 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Brain Sci. 2020 Apr 1;10(4):205. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10040205.
This is a comparative study of two novel noninvasive cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) monitoring methods based on intracranial blood volume (IBV) changes in the human brain. We investigated the clinical applicability of the new volumetric reactivity index (VRx2), reflected by intracranial ultrasonic attenuation dynamics for noninvasive CA monitoring. The CA was determined noninvasively on 43 healthy participants by calculating the volumetric reactivity index (VRx1 from time-of-flight of ultrasound, VRx2 from attenuation of ultrasound). The VRx was calculated as a moving correlation coefficient between the arterial blood pressure and noninvasively measured IBV slow waves. Linear regression between VRx1 and VRx2 (averaged per participants) showed a significant correlation ( = 0.731, < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval [0.501-0.895]) in data filtered by bandpass filtering. On the other hand, FIR filtering demonstrated a slightly better correlation ( = 0.769, < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval [0.611-0.909]). The standard deviation of the difference by bandpass filtering was 0.1647 and bias -0.3444; and by FIR filtering 0.1382 and bias -0.3669. This comparative study showed a significant coincidence of the VRx2 index compared to that of VRx1. Hence, VRx2 could be used as an alternative, cost-effective noninvasive cerebrovascular autoregulation index in the same way as VRx1 values are used.
这是一项基于人脑颅内血容量(IBV)变化的两种新型无创脑血管自动调节(CA)监测方法的比较研究。我们研究了由颅内超声衰减动力学反映的新的容积反应性指数(VRx2)在无创CA监测中的临床适用性。通过计算容积反应性指数(VRx1来自超声飞行时间,VRx2来自超声衰减),对43名健康参与者进行了无创CA测定。VRx计算为动脉血压与无创测量的IBV慢波之间的移动相关系数。在通过带通滤波滤波的数据中,VRx1和VRx2(每位参与者平均)之间的线性回归显示出显著相关性(=0.731,<0.0001,95%置信区间[0.501 - 0.895])。另一方面,FIR滤波显示出稍好的相关性(=0.769,<0.0001,95%置信区间[0.611 - 0.909])。带通滤波的差异标准差为0.1647,偏差为 - 0.3444;FIR滤波的差异标准差为0.1382,偏差为 - 0.3669。这项比较研究表明VRx2指数与VRx1指数有显著一致性。因此,VRx2可以像VRx1值一样用作一种替代的、具有成本效益的无创脑血管自动调节指数。